In the First Hour of the Obama Presidency with Noam Chomsky

Re: "If you have the opportunity to do more of these, they should be like this. "

The other video has had thousands more views in half the time.

BTW, I can see from your channel you're hardly lifting a finger for this ailing world of ours.

My questions and statements in all my videos have been straightforward. I repeated some of Noam's statements so people would hear them more than once.

It amazes me when people try to tell me what to do, as if it's their business. Wow.

WOW is right. You are responding to a comment two months after the fact, return vitriol for praise and try to judge me as a person and my level of activism based upon my YouTube profile! Because if it's not on YouTube, it didn't happen...just like your hypothetical doctorate, right? What you did in your other video was attrocious, misleading and unethical, which we've discussed at length. Are you really so insecure that you need to pick an ancient fight so you can brag about your page views?

One's YouTube channel is one's outlet to the world. If you don't try to help the suffering people here, then that's reflective as to who and what's important to you and who and what isn't.

Someone who cares uses every reasonable means within one's grasp to stop unnecessary human suffering.

The most important thing in Chomsky's life is Chomsky himself. He is the Maestro of Meaningless.

you should totally be a psychologist!!

You have a narrow definition of humanity if you genuinely believe that one's YouTube profile is the measure of their soul.

Your appeal to "help[ing] the suffering people" seems to be a catch-all for however you are currently choosing to waste your time on the internet. I fail to see how obscure online video propoganda that preaches to the choir (a narrow fringe) and uses the words of a renowned academic out of context to make a conspiratorial political point is helping the suffering.

and I would add. This conflict runs far deeper than any Noam vid blog can possibly vet. Peace is very far away now, whether you measure it in generations or bodies. There is much work to do. Let the best ideas rise and peace belong to those that work for it.

Zionism's definition keeps changing. I have no idea which definition you are refering to, but let me just tell you what I believe in.
I support Israel's right to defend itself. I also support Palestine's right to defend itself. I do NOT support Palestine claiming Israeli land. It seems that Israel has given up enough, yet Hamas still wants to fight. If death is the only way, then let them have it. But Israel should not kill those willing to negotiate.

All one has to do is look at a map of the area over time to see the truth about how the Israelis have usurped Palestinian land, fragmenting the people. They did the same thing in Lebanon. Invaded and took over. Until Israel gives back the territories they stole and withdraws then there will be no peace. Israel doesn't seem to want peace anyway. They want to eliminate the Palestinian people, get them off the land and move in. Meanwhile the Palestinians defend w/ sticks and stones. Tragic.

Why don't you state the whole story? If you were to state clearly for all to read that Israel was attacked by those countries or terrorist organizations in those areas and won the territory during the battle, does that damage your argument? Because that is the truth. Can you deal with that?