Rachel Maddow-Gay marriage opponents win right to hide

Rachel Maddow-Gay marriage opponents win right to hide

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• the
• rachel
• maddow
• show
• msnbc

[newkillerstardust]

The anti-gay pride want to be anonymous for it's own convenience.

[SuperBrianm]

@YellowBlackbird12 YOU ARE JUST SO CUTE WHEN YOU'RE IN A RAGE AND ATTEMPTING TO BE WITTY.

[SuperBrianm]

@YellowBlackbird12  YOU ARE SOOOO CUTE WHEN YOU'RE IN A RAGE AND ATTEMPTING TO BE WITTY.

[SuperBrianm]

@YellowBlackbird12 YOU ARE SOOOO CUTE WHEN YOU'RE IN A RAGE AND ATTEMPTING TO BE WITTY.

[SuperBrianm]

@YellowBlackbird12 IT'S JUST SIMPLY WHAT IT IS. SIMPLY ACCEPT THAT. A CERTAIN PERCENTAGE OF THE POPULATION IS GAY. NOT THE ENTIRE POPULATION OR A MAJORITY BUT A STABLE PERCENTAGE, LIKE A PERCENTAGE IS LEFT-HANDED OR HAS GREEN EYES OR ARE SHORT OR HAVE CURLY HAIR. NOT ALL BUT A PORTION THAT IS DIFFERENT THAN THE MAJORITY. THE SPECIES WILL CONTINUE, I GUARANTEE IT

[MamaMario13]

@newkillerstardust the gay prides have cyndi lauper singing, they should have anti gay pride with a float dedicated to anita bryant and one for freddy phelps

[YellowBlackbird12]

You could say the X zoo observed gay spider monkeys in one of their enclosures (that is one sentence and will fit in the box). I google search it, read the article, and we have a little discusion about it and how it benefits spider monkeys. So here is an easy question. What did you mean by archaic details? Since I think that you learn more about things by asking for details.

[jamesdc60]

@YellowBlackbird12 What I'm saying is... You can't expect to ask a question that requires a ten page explanation, and get such an answer in these little boxes. Thats why I said go look it up. And you've been defensive from the start, misunderstanding what I have said thus far, so unless you review and understand, what point is there in answering you further? Also, I mentioned earlier, "No nastiness needed", yet this is what you have given. With all due respect, calm down and try again.

[YellowBlackbird12]

@jamesdc60 Yes it truly was rude of me to ask you questions when you claimed you could answer them. I asked for two things: details and benfits of homosexuallity in nature. You didn't try to answer either question. Instead you got pissy and childish. You could have said google search X. I find X and we talk about it. But its too late for me to learn anything from your self-righteousness anyways. Next time don't offer to answer questions if you aren't going to bother to try.

[jamesdc60]

@YellowBlackbird12 First, go back a read what I wrote. Its pretty simple to understand. And if you want case study specifics, go look it up. There is no room for such an explanation here. As for benefits, I'm not going to waste my time with someone who has conversed in such a way thus far. This conversation was not so difficult as you have already made it. Please try again.