Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Refutation of Armenian Genocide, questiones and answer

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
9,272
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 10, 2006

Since 1915, numerous papers, reports, books, etc. were written and published about the immigration implementation. The Armenians, by using false documents have succeeded to deceit the World for a long time. The rumor about Armenian holocaust (!) which expressed at first as three hundred thousand and later increased to three million has no basis at all. In fact, although English and French authorities have extensively studied the Ottoman archives during their occupation in Istanbul have failed to find even a single document hinting about such holocaust.
Had the Ottoman State intended to make genocide on Armenians; could not they realize such an act at the places where the Armenians live? Why would it be necessary "to immigrate" them for such an intention? Why did they undertake the significant fiscal and material costs of their security, safety, health and food of the immigrating Armenians? During this immigration and re-settlement process which lasted approximately 1,5 year from May 1915 until October 1916, why would the central and local administrations take measures to ensure the lives and properties of Armenians in spite of the difficult war circumstances? In addition, would it be necessary to accept great administrative, military and financial burden -as if opening a new front- to protect and secure these people?
The answers to these questions shall be sufficient to understand the real intention of the Ottoman State. Also there is no logical explanation that why the Ottoman State suddenly changed its policy towards a community which had always been called as "millet-i sadika" (loyal people) due to their being really faithful to the Government. Hence the party whose attitude had changed was not the Ottoman Government, but the Armenians who were deceived by the independence promises of Russia and the Entente States.
In conclusion, it can be said that the Armenian Immigration which was a necessary measure to ensure the State Security and Safety is among one of the most successful transportation and re-settlement processes; and has no intention whatsoever to annihilate Armenians.

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (muzaffer0618)

  • Isn't it easier to just admit that the government committed genocide and apologize? I don't get why Turkey insists on denying that it happened. By not admitting and apologizing it simply creates tension between Turkey and Armenia, and between Turkey and the EU. Germany admitted to all of its atrocities and it's better off than had it decided to try to deny everything. If you look at Japan, their reluctance to admit to some crimes is a constant source of problems with China for no reason.

  • have u ever killed someone? if you didn t, and if i say you " u are a killer, u have to pay for that. admit it, and then u have to pay 1 million dollars to (so-called) victim's family and also u have to give ur own home to his family, and u will also live with a shame who killed somebody"

    But u are screaming that "noooo, i didn t " But even they don t let you to go to judgement, just some deputies are judging u and condemning you without any proof..

    WHAT WOULD U SAY?

  • I would say that although when it happened it may not have been genocide. After the 1948 Convention on Genocide it would be called genocide. It's a matter of semantics. I would say that if 300,000 to 1.5 million Armenian civilians died, that's a genocide. 300,000 is the figure that the Turkish government recognizes, and even Germany, Turkey's ally, put the figure at 1.5 million. I don't think Turkey is innocent at all. The excuses in this video seem like rationalizations for why it was ok...

  • Turkey lost so many civilians also. not only armenians suffered in that years. do u know what kind of evil things did the occupation powers in anatolia in that years? the population was like 7-8millions in anatolia, but before the war it was 11 millions. what happened to those civilians? come on.

    another topic is, the situation of istanbul armenians in 1915. nobody touch to them in the relocation. if it was a genocide, then how come nobody touched to istanbul armenians???

  • This is disgusting. It shows your ignorance and how much you believe what your idiotic government is telling you.

  • well, if u belive on this, why don t you answer those questiones?

Top Comments

  • hey GUYS !, the Turks have a point .. Why Armenians never applied to International War Crimes Tribunal ?

    Is that because they are very confident or they don't want the truth ? Or they don't want to hurt Turkish people's feelings ?

    I mean if it was me : I would apply to the court and embarrass them instead of spending that much propaganda money for 92 years... What is the propaganda for ? If you can not take it to the court then..

  • After observing these conversations I have decided the Genocide is a big lie !

    Because i have noticed Turks are inviting ad asking Armenians for a court bt Armenians are saying we want you to suffer :))

    Why Armos never wanted to make Turks suffer ntil now ? I bet a court do this quite well if they are right about their claims ..

    It means they are not right about their claims and they are frightened by the idea of being in a court

    Funny

see all

All Comments (238)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Quba genocide 1918

    /watch?v=2cnNPn8aYac

    Khojali genocide 1992

    /watch?v=iKBv3TtZXtU

    Terrorism of Armenians /watch?v=g4RSpg8ihSI

  • Its been 95 years since the so called genocide happened their scared thats why they wont take it to the international courts

  • look at u mariaalos007, trying to manipulate turks with ,why dont u guys accept it,just accept it everything will be ok(u made me laugh:) why dont u just be a nice girl and read some history and then come back here tell people what kind of big lie has been going on for years

  • I agree completely. Just because some Armenians did some really bad things doesn't mean that it was ok to exterminate the Armenian race or commit any other form of genocide. That's why this video doesn't make too much sense to me. It's saying that because some Armenians did bad things all Armenians deserved to die. Imagine if the US killed or deported or put in labor camps every muslim in America because of the 9/11 attacks. If the US did that it would be genocide.

  • okay answer to questions are yes armenians did kill turkish people this does not in any way justify turkey to decimate the whole race. Question two, turkey did try to bring in councils to define the matter but the thing is turkey can has and will spend millions of dollars to keep this underwraps. Self confidence? is that why you guys put people in jail if they mention genocide

  • eline saglik

    *****

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more