Venus Envy

Science's study of global warming should look to Venus,Earth's sister planet for answers. Venus experienced a warming event similar to what scientists theorize is happening on Earth.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• venus
• mars
• planets
• solar
• system
• space
• exploration
• nasa
• global
• warming
• climate
• earth
• crackrockid

[CactosS]

i belive the is great cover up about venus since the data from first proves say it might be a living planted, but the russians tray i think the 2 or 3 times more and they never really get the data for what is laying under the atmostfere,perhaps you can say the sulphuric acid is poison but ozone is poison aswell so we can jump to conclusions yet

[CrackrocKid]

We agree that Venus warrants more exploration. The Soviet's choice to concentrate on Venus so early in their space program seems illogical. Why skip over our moon, the closest body to Earth? Also, considering the USA insisted the Soviet's could not be trusted; it's strange we take their word for anything-regarding anything. Then, we must as why Venus is seen as blue in all of the photographs from Voyager, but is depicted as a murky yellow in most recent illustrations.

[galanetics]

The video isn't about colonizing Venus.

[CrackrocKid]

It's about a lot of things:). Thanks for watching and commenting, CRK

[Surathan]

Venus Envy is also a web comic >.>

[low7free]

The reason why Nasa looks at mars is because they already know earth is doomed. Were Next up to get fucked-u see, mars is where they plan to rebuild and leave the rest of us to cook. They knew this for quite some time. The object is Mars and building life on Mars, to escape Earth and live on!

[chabba77]

The scaremongers who like to say that earth will end up like Venus are ignoring two important differences between the two planets. First of all, it's closer to the sun. It also rotates so slow, that a day is longer than a year. That gives the sun much, much more time to heat up each point on the surface. This "greenhouse effect" isn't the only thing to blame for the extreme heat on our sister planet, which is more like Hell, than Eden.

[TheCZMan]

one should be dismissed in favour of the other. (two phenonema overlapping: one natural and the other human made)

This tells a lot about the success of the concept of responsibility.

I dont know your vid log and maybe you have already a vid hinging around it but I am looking forward the moment when you are going to blame this or that person to cast their responsability away. I really am.

[TheCZMan]

One should feed a huge ego to think that undoing Nature is the priority.

Maybe clearer, a change on Venus does absolutely not go against the very possibility that human activity impacts on the GCC.

Hey, why not use the very fact that human life expectancy is limited by Nature to dismiss any charge of murder: shouldnt be removed the charge that a man dies before his natural end because it is known that noone lives eternally?

The same here: because they might be two natural phenomena overlappi

[TheCZMan]

Sounds like a self defeating argumentation.

Scientists doing what they are told to: why not? but should it mean that NASA (if given credits by the US government) should be in line with current US government, which has been one of the most involved in rejecting the possibility that human activity has a consequence on a global climate change?

Warming experienced on Venus: well, logics and common sense should tell at once that it should be better to focus on what Mankind does, not what Nature doe

[RogerOnTheRight]

Scientists are increasingly abandoning science for politics. Sad, but true. Michael Crichton has written lots on this.

For 400,000 years or so, there has been a rough correlation between "greenhouse gas" concentration and temperature. This history is used to make the global warming case.

What the "scientists" fail to mention is that temperature rise always precedes gas concentration increase. So, co2 and methane cannot have caused temperature rise.