Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Re: Perpetual Motion

This is not exactly Perpetual Motion acording to this article made in 1996. But it is close... Source: http://www.galleri-finsrud....  
 
Customize

More From: sjefern

Loading...

QuickList(0)

This is a video response to Perpetual Motion
9 ratings
Sign in to rate
4,261 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (15)   Options

Loading...
8RR8R8 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
It smashes the dogma of "thermodynamics" anyway. If the "law" was true it shouldn't have been a self-sustained closed system. But it is.

spinning is the magic!
DerekEvilsizor (1 year ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
I can't believe all the big words some of you idiots try to use to nit pick about the definition of perpetual motion devices. Just to put down someone for manifesting and realizing an idea. I think therefore I am. I produce, therefore I contribute. this is one of my favorite examples of perpetual motion, how many hours of fine tuning it must've taken. I think this device speaks volumes of what can be accomplished as individuals. and the negative comments speak not just of naivety, but disrespect
nancyl2 (1 year ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Thanks it answers everyones quarry about
it stoping, dirt and dust will do that.
So thanks for sharing.

Nancyl2
jonson11122 (1 year ago) Show Hide
 -2
Marked as spam
Of course it stops! Nothing is forever!

But this IS perpetual motion. Please be careful: definition of perpetual motion does not include word 'forever'.

It violates the law of conservation of energy, which states that energy can never be created or destroyed.

Read the definition of perpetual motion in wikipedia.
locouk (1 year ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Even with the glass cover tiny metallic particles will wear from the rails and bearings etc.. and eventually foul the working parts.
alexioco (1 year ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
true, energy is not free anyway as you have to put the energy in then conserve it, so you had to "do something" first...
locouk (1 year ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
The simpler the better with these devices, The more moving parts you have, the more chance of energy loss. Perhaps even the simple Capillery Jar where water goes up a fine tube to drip back into it's own resovior won't work, although common sense says it should work. I think this machine is harnessing a heat differential between the top and the bottom of it, and making a false claim of perpetual motion.
jordanthomaspower (1 year ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
its amazing
itsblockdog (1 year ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
Marvelous. Dust? Environment. I think it's fantastic! Thank you for posting.....
sjefern (2 years ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
It is the same machine yeah. The only difference is that the inventor has build a glasshous for it now. He did not have that in the begining.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.