Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

The Redistricting Game

Jacob Soboroff visits with Chris Swain, director of the University of Southern California's Electronic Arts Game Innovation Lab. Swain is the creator of the cutting-edge Redistricting Game, which l...  
 
Customize
Donate to this organization

QuickList(0)

Featured Videos

143 ratings
Sign in to rate
83,071 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (80)   Options

Loading...
gizmosells (1 year ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Common sense draw poltical boundries on county lines, and critera to limit vote packing. Incumbents both democrats, and republicans benefit from gerrymandering, or playmandering the system. Look at Delay in 2003 reforms are needed to have competitve elections.
Zackerxy (8 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
YOu cant just go on county lines though, because you must have population equality. It is sometimes neccessary to break such hard lines.
sabenbennett (2 years ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Democracy is based on individuals having equal rights, Republics are based on states having equal rights. America is a Democratic Republic, individual rights have to be balanced with states' rights. I don't think the Electoral College is the main threat to democracy in America. STV would be a great system for ensuring Democracy WITHIN the states and fairness between states at a federal level.
gueneveve (2 years ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Thanks for raising awareness, btw. I appreciate that.
Bullettube (2 years ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
Every American should demand an end to redistricting by political parties! It should be done by a non-partisan group every 10 years.
sabenbennett (2 years ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Or every election by an independently appointed organisation. Australia has no problems with the AEC.
camalusthegodofwar (2 years ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
I don't agree with the IRV. You're just adding another step. Plurality voting is just more straight forward.
sabenbennett (2 years ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
More straight forward, and less democratic. I happen to prefer democracy over simplicity.

Of course, I live in Australia where IRV is used. I happen to favour STV (Single Transferable Vote) for American presidential elections. It fits in better with the history of the Electoral College. IRV is for single-member electorates.
camalusthegodofwar (2 years ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
We have a bicameral system for a reason. To make sure each state has a equal voice (The Senate) and to make sure the population of each state is effectively represented (The House). Its to make sure that the large states down override the small states and that the majority is still heard.
sabenbennett (2 years ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Agree with this comment. Bicameral systems put checks and balances in place in the legislative sector of government. In Australia our Senate works as a review body- no House legislation can pass without the approve of the Senate. A 2 house majority is required to pass most legislation, though usually the Senate allowed legislation drafted in the House to pass with revisions, even if the minor parties hold the Balance of Power.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.