Fox News Anchor Asks if Nelson Amendment Will Lead to More 'Low-Income Babies'

more at foxnews.com, December 7, 2009

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• fox
• news
• anchor
• alisyn
• camerota
• nelson
• amendment
• health
• care
• reform
• bill
• debate
• senate
• legislation
• abortion
• funding
• low
• income
• babies

[HoochieKoochie]

@michahsimmons

Life isn't fully manifested until the child has developed in life. If you care so much about life, why do you not care about the oppression of non-whites, genocides in other countries and war, homelessness and poverty? Champion these causes to become truly pro-life.

One of the most pro-life thing you could do is have awesome sex since this is a celebration of life. Wouldn't you agree since we are both absolutely guilt-free about our sexuality, really I am horny right now. YES!

[jimprjayp]

Probably yes they falsify stats, refer to swine flu scare of 1970's 60minutes episode. At one point it was legal in some states and not others. But the big positive was the lower overall birth rate of teenage pregnancy. Either they were more careful or more scared which made them more careful.

Would you drive 65mph into a brick wall just because you have airbags? Now go ask a 17 year old that question. I'll bet you get a different answer. Give young people an excuse to risk their life..

[jimprjayp]

Now you've escalated this to a fight. You were making sense. His(her) logic is faulty and the opinion is just that, his idea. At least without the proof he's asking you to find for him. "Yes, officer, I'll confess so you don't have to do your job." Please...

[jimprjayp]

Are you really naive enough to believe the gov. has your safety in mind when they "offer" you an abortion "free" of cost?

FREE? Money is the only thing the government attributes to the people, the bill!

They decide and we pick up the tab. As good citizens of course. If we really had a democratic choice we would be voting on it.

We are now teaching our youth that we live in a democracy but then the court decides for us and all of a sudden the Republic shines (diffused) through.

[jimprjayp]

Too late, the government made it their business when they decided Roe v Wade. I don't disagree with your argument just making a comment about the fact that too often us citizens refer to "the government" as an entity outside of themselves. By doing so we give over our power to them even if its only philosophically. We are the government. And as "the government" WE should not pay for any elective surgery! Insurance companies don't and for good reason, you want it bad enough you'll pay for it

[jimprjayp]

As far as I know it isn't possible to prove something hasn't happened. Furthermore, our judicial system says innocent until proven guilty. So the burden of proof is yours my friend. You are the obligated party who has to prove that african-american's have rioted or simply asked for as a group (I presume you meant low income) to have the state pay for their abortion(s).

[kemetkush]

never in the history of black-american, have they riot, becaues they want it the right to have abortion.

[turok4lyfe]

Haha yeah, im guessing you based that statement off of something you read from mediamatters.

[kemetkush]

poor people never ask for abortion, only the racists rich, ask for it for them.

[Bei1052]

When you run out of things to say, resort to insults.

Yeah, that'll learn 'em!