Why NonBelievers Speak Out
Top Comments
All Comments (391)
-
Religion is the opiate of the masses.
-
@DeathUnshrouded you do love the word "Vacuous" don't you - you seem to have used it religiously (pardon the pun)
-
@marminxy so what you are saying is that you admit that you would rape and kill and steal if god hadn't told you you would be punished for it? YOU ARE AN IDIOT. We know how we want to be treated and we do that to others. If god instilled our virtues and righteousness then how do you explain murderers? rapists? robbers? did god FAIL ?? did he miss some human beings? THINK JUST A LITTLE BIT PLEASE!!! your bringing our entire race down by saying we are incapable of doing these things without god.
-
@marminxy "If u cannot see the intricacies that God had in mind in both the Micro and Macro Eco systems...I feel sorry for you, ur missing out on the most amazing properties."
Oh the old fashioned argument from design. Got to love it, the only "evidence" for the ridiculous assertion is that things "appeared to be designed", that's some science! I feel sorry for you if you think that holds any water. I name call people who make logical fallacies, believer or none-believer.
-
@marminxy "Who made you dude?"
That would be mama and papa. If you want to get into the specifics I suggest you study human reproduction. It may reduce the number of platitudes you utter as well, which would help all parties involved.
"but the same fact remains, and that is, that an intelligent being made absolutely everything."
Absolutely vacuous, you have nothing to support this grand claim.
-
@marminxy "WHOM are you so damn angry at?"
Hmm, perhaps "rockmaneleveneleven". Perhaps because that is the person I mentioned in my comment. Perhaps you should try this wonderful exercise called "reading". Also, your hilarious and vacuous straw man argument doesn't even deserve a response. Exactly what "theory" am I propping up by saying God of the Gaps is a logical fallacy? I feel sorry for you because you think you actually made a proper argument.
as we cannot know what animals actually think or feel, your claims about what animals think and feel are nothing more then assertions.
however, from what we can infer from studying animals, we have ample reason to infer, on the basis of their behavior, that they do in fact have feelings such as love, sympathy, compassion, etc.
tooltime9901 2 years ago 16
first off, what do you think "love" and "compassion" are? if they are modes of thought an behavior, then I have a hard time seeing why you could not accept they they "developed from the primal ooze"
tooltime9901 2 years ago 8