Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Tu-95 Bear 300 ft above

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
69,917
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jun 20, 2009

Tu-95 MS (Bear-H) bomber on approach for a landing at Dyagilevo air base in Ryazan, Russia.
Filmed 06/21/2009.
geo:lat=54.66207938547558 geo:lon=39.67931270599365

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 3 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Video Responses

This video is a response to Russian Bear is back
see all

All Comments (162)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @RottenAce I'd imagine if you are dropping nuclear bombs, loudness isn't really a problem. nuclear bombs are quite loud. I think it looks cooler than a b-52

  • By the way, that loudness of Tu-95 is a payment for a high energy efficiency of the engines - about 82%. If you put normal jet engines, it will flight quieter, but for a shorter distance. Soviets decided that plane which carries nuclear rocket does not needs to be quiet, - such rockets could be launched from a very long distance from the target, so they've put on turboprop engines on it.

  • I Love that loudy turbo props!!

  • All that means (a plane being loud) is that it alerts me quicker to go outside and record a plane flyover! :D

  • @RottenAce In your dreams, maybe B-52 are better. But the real fact is that they are fully equeal in all aspects. Loudest...so what?

  • 1:04- 1:11 AAAAHHH!!!!! IT'S GONNA CRASH INTO THE B- 1:12 oh.... lol! nice video! well, next....

  • I live near this airbase and I'm proud of it! So haters STFU & GTFO!

  • I guess Russia is proud to have the loudest military aircraft that you can hear over 2 miles away in modern military history. The B-52 is waaaay more superior than the Tu-95 anyday.

  • Way more adaptable? I dunno about that, the Tu-95 is used in multiple-roles that should make it at least as "adaptable" as the ancient B-52. Also you insist on that silly ridiculous argument of the engine "noise". Look pal, if you think that in our present-day world, the modern air defense systems rely, at all, on listening or hearing whether enemy aircraft might be approaching you, you live in bloody Jurassic park. The Tu-95 has the same speed of the B-52, and the range difference is marginal.

  • @vonkaunaz The B-52 is WAY more adaptable.It can carry missile's aswell as a far superior bomb load.Not to mention the TU-95 is based off the B-29 super fortress fuselage (WICH IS TRUE!) Not to mention the superior range of the B-52 and its far quieter.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more