The Alex Jones Show 4/28/11: New Obama Birth Certificate is a Forgery! 2/3

Kurt Nimmo
April 28, 2011
http://www.infowars.com/
http://www.prisonplanet.tv/
http://www.infowars.net/
http://www.prisonplanet.com/

Our investigation of the purported Obama birth certificate released by Hawaiian authorities today reveals the document is a shoddily contrived hoax. Infowars.com computer specialists dismissed the document as a fraud soon after examining it.

Check out the document released by WhiteHouse.gov for yourself.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-lo...
Upon first inspection, the document appears to be a photocopy taken from state records and printed on official green paper. However, when the government released PDF is taken into the image editing program Adobe Illustrator, we discover a number of separate elements that reveal the document is not a single scan on paper, as one might surmise. Elements are placed in layers or editing boxes over the scan and green textured paper, which is to say the least unusual.

When sections of the document are enlarged significantly, we discover glaring inconsistencies. For instance, it appears the date stamped on the document has been altered. Moreover, the document contains text, numbers, and lines with suspicious white borders indicating these items were pasted from the original scan and dropped over a background image of green paper.

VIDEO: Alex Jones gives proof that Obama's purported birth certificate is fraud.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3g30VCl_cgk

Let's assume the state of Hawaii scanned the original document and placed it on the green textured background. This does not explain the broken out or separate elements. There is no logical reason for this to be done unless the government planned to modify the document and make it appear to be something other than it is.

There are two elements of interest, as shown in the image to the above -- both entries for the date accepted by the local registry. This appears to have been modified in an image editing program.

The media was quick to dispel the fact the document was modified. "Our analysis of the latest controversy: The original birth certificate was probably in a 'negative' form, and someone at the White House took it upon themselves to doctor it up so the form can be readable," writesJoe Brooks for Wireupdate.

Nathan Goulding, writing for the National Review, tells us anybody can open the White House released PDF in Illustrator and it will break out into layers. "I've confirmed that scanning an image, converting it to a PDF, optimizing that PDF, and then opening it up in Illustrator, does in fact create layers similar to what is seen in the birth certificate PDF. You can try it yourself at home," he writes.

Indeed, but this does not answer the question why in the Obama birth certificate PDF the layers or elements contain dates -- which appear to be modified -- and the signature of the state registrar. If the document was acquired from state records in whole, why was it necessary to add elements? Goulding and Brooks do not address this issue.

These layers are also revealed by the White House issued PDF's hex file in freeware hex editor. Within its code are listed 8 image masks, which if changed from value "true" to "false" turn off and on to reveal the layers as demonstrated in the video and in Illustrator. Whether these represent compression artifacts or other digitizing processes, or whether these masks represent deliberate manipulation remains to be conclusively shown.

http://www.infowars.com/new-obama-birth-certificate-is-a-forgery/

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• barack
• obama
• white
• house
• birth
• certificate
• hoax
• scam
• The
• Alex
• Jones
• Show
• 4/28/11New
• Obama
• Birth
• Certificate
• is
• Forgery
• infowars.com
• military
• news
• talk
• analysis
• debate
• politics
• communism
• warfare

[LogicCheck]

Kerning point vetted ... set that in abeyance (aside), as first and foremost:, AGAIN, the most BLARING laser light focus for the informed and/or discerning is upon the piece-meal add-effect wrought of compiled donor "typography"aka typo-setting aka font selection: NO 1940's, 1950's or early 1960's (or for that matter ANY non-customized typewriter or heat block sets) would avail eg. the name Kapiolani Maternity, with "unique a's" characters formation; first A a non-match to others; get it ?

[theherdmentality]

@countlode this whole birtth certificate thing is just to di ert people's attention? can't "they" already do that via other more interesting means, and get everyone's attention?

WHy not hypnotize angelina jolie into stripping naked on live t.v.? sure THAT would get more heads looking away than tthis stupid birther nonsense.

[UFOgospel]

watch?v=USoWpLll4Cg There is proof right here. I tried it my self and the "B" in both OBAMAs listed match up 100% pixel by pixel. This is impossible to do with a typewriter. It's like having two of the same exact fingerprints.

[Daealis]

Idiots doing research for a moron, claiming to have something. Simple, standard procedures that will have the same effect on ANY document of similar nature(scanned images), computer artifacting and stupid machines making errors in distinction. Give this to a whackjob with too much time and he'll prove a conspiracy or the end of the world with it.

With Nothing. Like this idiot just did. I'd love to listen this, the humour-value is great, but I fear this level of stupidity might be contagious.

[RAMKING61]

You do realize that was ex-Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill, right?

He was the Treasury Secretary under Bush until he was fired by Bush.

His '60 Minutes' interview is mind bending.

[cjeculver]

@whipthenations Depends. WRT his views on the COLB, long enough. Illuminati-style conspiracies in general? Not at all. Jones' COLB presentations, however, rely heavily on insinuation, argumentum ad populum, appeals to authority, selective sourcing and the like, which makes him a pretty garden variety conspiracist. Every Illuminati-style conspiracy theory I've ever heard does the same. Is yours different? But this is all off-topic. If you wish to discuss it, I'll be happy to do so via e-mail.