William Lane Craig on The Michael Coren Show 5/5
Top Comments
All Comments (575)
-
@CbandMaster. There is no right and wrong according to your worldview. Only socially acceptable, and socially unacceptable. This means that if your parents raised you in a good atheist manner, you would probably know what to do in certain situations. You would also, however, be taught that when it comes to it, there is no right and wrong.
-
@ghae1 If you had a good upbringing with good structure and good morals, then you should know right from wrong, correct?
-
@CbandMaster May I ask you something? You obviously being an atheist and all.. Why shouldn't I steal your wallet, if I got away from it? I mean, there are no objective moral values. Right?
-
This is hard to watch...that atheist guy is so awkward!!! Am I the only one that thinks that??
-
@BlongBlarble " Isn't Atheism just a little boring? " No, Atheism is freeing the mind and thinking rationally and using common sense. You had smart parents. Its easier to believe in religion than to reject it. The mind can be weak and thats where religion comes in. Although we would like to believe in a life after death, Its just not happening.
-
@kaixjin I have a question for ya. Isn't Atheism just a little boring? I grew up in a home that was "Godless". My parents thought the concept was stupid. I went through a bible bashing phase in my early 20's cause it's easy to do. I've since become "spiritual" with a belief in a higher power. The whole "we die and that's it" just wasn't working for me. I'm not really sure what I converted to, all I can say is that I'm spiritual with some sense that this life just ain't the end...
-
For a group that claims to be the "brights", you would think the materialists would blow the competition away. However, in debate after debate that I see, that's not the case at all. When it comes to applying the laws of logic, the theist position tends to come out ahead. Notice how the atheist in the video could not articulate a position on why there is no God.
-
I'm a bit irritated with this debate. I am an atheist, but feel that all main points made by the atheist were either fallacious or downright stupid. He is unable to defend himself because, frankly, he doesn't know what he's talking about. William Lane Craig made a few fallacies, one being an equivocation fallacy on the definition of atheism. All ideologies and viewpoints here were misrepresented, in my opinion. Not a very good debate. :/
-
@clawedification Wow. Were you picking and choosing what you heard on this particular program? That's a rhetorical question because you were obviously doing that to come to your conclusion.
The atheist guy is a complete noob idiot. Every single answer he gave was 'well that depends'. All he did was confuse himself more and more and create many false dichotomies. Craig is obviously very good at debating, while this does not make his claims 100% true, it certainly discredits the atheist. I have never heard a decent argument for the non existence of God, not anything that actually stands.
satch500 8 months ago 11
Michael Payton constantly interrupts William Lane Craig and William Craig exercises great patience and humility by allowing the rude and arrogant Michael Payton to constantly interrupt with his outspoken ludicrous oratories.
Jehovahourgod 6 months ago 10