Greg Palast Interview
Uploader Comments (COAnews)
Top Comments
-
6. Diebold's touch screen voting machines have no paper trail of any votes. There's no way to verify the data.
7. California banned the use of Diebold machines because the security was so bad.
8.Jeb Bush's first choice as running mate in 1998 was Sandra Mortham, a paid lobbyist for ES&S who received a commission for every county that bought its touch-screen machines.
-
1.80% of all U.S. votes are counted by 2 companies: Diebold and ES&S
2.The VP of Diebold and the president of ES&S are brothers
3.There's no federal agency with regulatory authority over the US voting machine industry.
4. The chairman and CEO of Diebold, is a major Bush campaign organizer and donor who wrote in 2003 that he was "committed to helping Ohio deliver its electoral votes to the president next year."
5.30% of all U.S. votes are carried out on unverifiable touch screen voting machines
All Comments (122)
-
In case you missed it: Greg Palast apologizes to Dr. Steven Jones: "An
apology and hope for reasoned discourse" I know this video interview took place about 4 years ago but it is notable that his opinion has changed concerning the WTC 1, 2, and 7 demolitions
-
1) there's no contradiction between wanting to suppress oil sales initially in order to increase prices, while scheming to ultimately force the privatization in order to purchase the oil fields further on...
2) palast's barber is clearly conspiring against him.
-
I recently said PenguinJesus has the best name on YouTube. I retract that comment. Kudos to you for adding something useful to YouTube.
-
Way to divert the subject to something he didnt even try to apeak about, jackass. Mr. palast has such a cornicopia of info we all need to know, and changing the subject to whack-job Truther nonsense is utterly disgraceful
-
fock off! if you were making 5.6k you wouldn't try fleecing u-tubers - cock sucker!
-
don't use a postal ballot though
-
Would someone PLEASE send Greg a copy of the FDR from AA77? Let him investigate that for awhile, because no one disagrees with him on the points he is currently making - but our Congress has proven that they are completely inept at doing anything about going after these men.
-
Under threat of libel action
The question is: Where is the evidence? He is an investigative reporter with sources in the intelligence community. And he found no evidence for the inside job. I would like the conspiracy theorist to produce just one person who participated in the plot or has direct knowledge of any aspect of the plot. A plot like this must have involved hundreds, yet no one has come forward.
Now Palast is vilified because he doesn't support a conspiracy theory built entirely on speculation.
hugowhimsy 4 years ago
hugowhimsy, my sentiments exactly. The conspiracy theory is built on leaps of logic. I made myself read what I'm told is a good book how the conspiracy can be proved (Crossing the Rubicon) - it's this guy was supposedly doing this, and his father is connected to this person - bla bla
COAnews 4 years ago