Stoplight - Defending Abstinence

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
3,826
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 24, 2007

CitizenLink Managing Editor Stuart Shepard shares his thoughts on efforts to end federal funding of abstinence education.

  • likes, 24 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (8)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @zorroazulapex Having sex inside marriage can affect you negatively as well, if you follow what these abstinence-only programs are teaching, which is NOTHING past waiting until marriage. That means no STD testing, no talking to your partner about what to do about any pregnancies, no talking about family planning or if and when either of you want kids, etc. Abstinence-only promotes a lack of communication. Comprehensive sex ed teaches healthy relationships AND abstinence; as the OPTION it is.

  • Abstinance IS effective, but SO ARE condoms.

  • Wow! I like this guy. Who has the courage to say this stuff anymore!

  • Why have STDs and pregnancies have increased radically over the last 50 years? Could you please explained what, other than teaching abstinence, has changed?

  • Encouraging high-schoolers to have sex? What went through those kid's minds right then, that having sex doesn't come with responsibilities or that having sex outside of marriage can't affect you negatively?

  • "Healthy kids don't need liberals." --Ouch! . . . And wow!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more