Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Improbability is not impossibility

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
11,160
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
  • likes, 31 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (448)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • 0:00 German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer thought that there was no evolutionary process without human perceivers, but he was also not a creationist. Do atheists get that?

  • What? No pennies?

  • As a geologist, the video responce sweetmikser left on this video amuses me.

  • You look like kinda like girl in every vid

  • People make far too many comments assuming and superimposing so many things, people need to better understand that ZJ's perspectives or if not personal perspectives as i am not this person and cannot speak for ver, is that which is logically common or at least more so common in philo, Arguments and point are Logical things they are to be done in a Logical manner and logical inconstancy is not a viable means to an end in an argument,

  • as for those who seek to find a Theist Ideal for Creation you could work on improving the Teleological argument, or the Cosmological, even the Intelligent Design Argument, but for that you would need to read up on David Hume, Paley, even knowing Edwards views, or better understanding the arguments for or against cultural relativism would help to strength as well as better your stand points,

  • @sweetmikser Atheist's are far more interesting people then theists, even i cannot acclaim to be an atheist, for those of us which i am sure are many who do not have any understanding of the terms being flung around, Atheist, broken down is Anti-Theist or One who does not believe in ANY Higher Power being, of any kind. then there are Agnostic, who believe there May be a higher power but they don't know which. As for creation, i suggest you read up on Quantum Mechanics, string theory, M-theory

  • @Kuranoniisama you sound stupid. How do you know dogmatically that it was "NOT" a "deity creation"? You have FAITH that it was not. You have no observable "proof" that it wasn't. You just ASSERT it. Despite the implications for intelligent direction. That I won't even go into with you, as I know it's a waste of time. I've already been on the merry-go-round with you drones many times. I'm busy. (And "abiogenesis" theory is NOT "the most acceptable", just the most convenient for atheist losers.)

View all Comments »
Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more