Our version of Stan's EMF evidence

This is how easy it is to get a EMF reader to talk to you...

Category:

Education

Tags:

• jeff
• peckmam
• stan
• romanek
• denver
• alien
• window

[Warningradio]

Can I just say that this video was made in jest? It was not a scientific debunking of Stan's evidence. There was clearly not enough information in his video to do a scientific debunking. This video was purely meant to make fun of a funny situation and point out that it wasn't remarkable evidence. If it hurts your sensibilities, move on.

[th3k0w]

alright. anywho, before this went into tangent land, all i was saying was i agree with you that stan romanek is laughable. i just find fault with your method of debunking him. that is less debunking, more making fun of. i just find that in poor taste. thats all. now really can we just leave it with that? it's so simple after all.

[Warningradio]

@th3k0w I hope my blanket comment that I just left cleared things up a bit. No debunking was actually being done. It was only a demonstration that nothing extraordinary or paranormal needs to take place to get the same result. Yes, my sense of humor can be crude. I have no intention of changing that. Sorry.

[th3k0w]

look, point is that i'm not your teacher. i'm not here to educate you case by case. i was simply stating that your method of "debunking" is less fact driven and more about looking better than the person who put forth the supposed evidence in the first place. i kinda find that to be in bad taste. especially when the feild of paranormal research isn't taken seriously because of these kinds of tactics. how you have equated it with all of this is beyond me.

[Warningradio]

@th3k0w Oh, you come onto my channel and start telling me how to do things and now you say you're not my teacher? Yes, you are a coward. If you don't like my methods, use your little mouse to navigate the fuck away from my channel. You are a short sighted know-it-all and I am not the least bit swayed by any of your arguments. Until you can stop hiding, act like a man, and meet me on equal ground where we can talk, I have no use for you.

[th3k0w]

o.0 but... he DID follow through with his theory. he DID create a device. did it work? no. is that a typical result using the scientific method. yes. seriously. i'm gonna start calling you glenn beck. listen. the scientific method begins with an unkown. a paranormal occurance. and with trial and reasoning, seaks to explain said occurance. thats 4th grade science right thar.

[Warningradio]

@th3k0w Wow, the Thomas Edison museum has no record of this follow through... Interesting.

You are arguing a completely different point than the one you started. Having a thought doesn't advance science until it is followed through, tested, and verified. That's third grade stuff right there... Grow a pair and come on my radio show to school me without you hiding behind a screen name and keyboard.

[NewWaysMusic]

If you want to discredit Romaneck, don't get an Alien to hold the EMF

[idris09]

LOL!!!! Thhhhank you. Wonderful.

[Warningradio]

@th3k0w May I also ask how this statement furthered science? He was waxing! Science never "assumes", it tests! Assuming or making a hypothesis is a very early step in the scientific method and only going to that step is NOT advancing anything.