Tremper Longman III on Cornelius Van Til
Loading...
Loading...
2,996
Link to this comment:
Share to:
Loading...
- 10:34Top Bible scholars respond to Ehrmanby OneBibleOneGod8,562 views
- 2:34Cornelius Van Til and Greg Bahnsen: Got Logic?by RedBeetle1,804 views
- 2:14Wayne Grudem on John Calvin, Bavinck, Machen an...by Zondervancom10,226 views
- 6:19Cornelius Van Til: His Heresy Refuted (1)by RedBeetle3,452 views
- 1:25Gordon Fee on Tom Wright and other authorsby Zondervancom24,624 views
- 8:07Van Til Apologetics at WTSby DPMosteller994 views
- 40:58Presuppositional Apologetics - Part 1: Ultimate...by exposedatheists2,003 views
- 1:48Craig S. Keener on the book of Revelationby Zondervancom2,077 views
- 3:52Walter C. Kaiser Jr. discusses Old Testament st...by Zondervancom4,298 views
- 9:56Bill Craig - Van Til was not a Philosopher?by realapologetics1,003 views
- 1:19Tremper Longman III - On The Bible And Sexualit...by WilberforceVideo1,122 views
- 3:47Was Cornelius Van Til Insane?by RedBeetle684 views
- 0:44Douglas J. Moo on C.S. Lewisby Zondervancom4,330 views
- 55:42Why I Believe In God - by Cornelius Van Tilby rfvidz1,131 views
- 6:44John Frame and Cornelius Van Til (7)by ClarkApologetics989 views
- 2:11Cornelius Van Til and Federal Visionby RedBeetle2,005 views
- 1:34Tremper Longman III - On Old Testament studiesby Zondervancom1,167 views
- 4:43What is Westminster Apologetics? - Part 2 (West...by WestminsterOnline694 views
- 4:06Cornelius Van Til, Predilection, and Reasonby Julio2301234 views
@cyk1217 how so? I'm afraid the facts are the opposite of what you are describing. Van Til's work and Bahnsen's work are a mess of fallacies that have been incinerated by Dawson Bethrick.
actionjackson864 6 months ago
@actionjackson864 Then it's clear that you haven't actually read it word for word.
cyk1217 6 months ago
@actionjackson864 Ok.
VitorGrando1 8 months ago
"defense of the faith" is one of the, if not the most fallacious, predatory, dishonest "account" of philosophy on the face of the planet.
actionjackson864 1 year ago
@RedBeetle You have no idea what you're talking about sir
4jchan 1 year ago
@owcpensamien
Perpetual virginity of Mary is essential to the Christian belief of How Christ had to be born, however, this is completely different from the "Immaculate Conception" theology of the church of rome which is one of the reasons for the reformation.
given that you said that these men did not believe in sola scriptura is grossly incorrect. For their basis of how they followed their churches was lead by scripture only which is another reason for the reformation from the church of rome
theembracedofgod 1 year ago
@jacqueshock -Good one!!
JohnO318 1 year ago
@jacqueshock -Good one!!
JohnO318 1 year ago
"Huge heretic." Perhaps to a protestant, evangelical, or reformed theologian he is a heretic, but to a vast majority of the Christian world who embrace Cristus Victor and Sripture + tradition, he is right on. I laud him for having the intellectual cajones to contradict the extremes to which Calvins followers have taken his teachings. Remember, Calvin and Luther both believed in the perpetual virginity of Mary and did not believe in Sola Sciptura as you define it. Careful how you label people.
owcpensamientos 1 year ago
vAN TIL taught that God is one person and three persons in the same sense. This is heresy. No reformed doctrine would support his arguments. He sights no biblical exegesis for these claims because there are no scriptures to support this irrationalism.
CASEYMARK76 1 year ago