Creationism Is Dead
Uploader Comments (dudev)
Top Comments
-
"he was also a failure in propagating his own family"
Actually, there are plenty of Darwin's descendants running around. Author Matthew Chapman covered the Dover Trial and is Darwin's great-great grandson.
"Eugenics is based"
Darwin wrote against the evils of eugenics, because it isn't Natural Selection, and has more in common with cattle farming.
"Bible it's history is embedded and has been found true by several archeologists"
LOL
All Comments (556)
-
@pppaaaooo13 And there is no evidence against the Harry Potter style witchcraft like in the Bible and the six day creation. "Pow"! there's a cow and "Pow"! there's a horse!
-
I hope the funeral is soon so they know that Creationism is truly dead. I'm tired of defending reason.
-
@hdregmore So you're inferring that he said something he didn't say based on your subjective opinion of things he did say? The Creationist mentality is way beyond our own, clearly. Seriously, you lost this argument badly. Shameful.
-
Back for schooling? Creationism is still as scientifically useless as it was a year ago.
-
@alphaenemy He did so with his stupidity.
That was a year ago.
Good to see that atheists are still quick on the uptake. lol.
-
@AngelicSnowGirl Creationism would have to come up with one single, testable, verifiable bit of evidence in order to even get on the right track to vindication. It's been trying the same shitty arguments for hundreds of years, though, and somehow seems to still think it's still a good argument.
-
@Aluxiel I'd actually suggest that you study evolution, then. See what it is explaining. You seem open minded.
-
@SplendidDissenter Pascal made a stupid wager.
Actually evidence mount up AGAINST evolution
pppaaaooo13 11 months ago
@pppaaaooo13
Only if you live in a big bubble of ignorance. But please point to this mounting evidence -- does it come from a religious source? I'm guessing it does.
dudev 11 months ago 3
@dudev ...okay, I've looked at a couple of things you've commented on bcuz your ignorance is astounding!
There is NO EVIDENCE of evolution as you think. An ape cannot give birth to a man, MACROevolution. There is plenty of evidence that proves MICROevolution, in both fossils and at work within our lifetimes. For someone so interested in biology you sure seem to know nothing about it.
Darwin himself, in his book Origin of Species says that mircoevolution is what is happening, not macroevolution
alasjajo 1 day ago in playlist Uploaded videos
@alasjajo
Be honest. Have you read On The Origin Of Species? I have --several times. The evidence for macro-evolution came before the evidence for micro-evolution. Darwin wrote extensively about how fossils animals don't match modern species. The contrast is enormous between extinct species and living ones.
I have a library of hundreds of books, and thousands of papers, all devoted to biology, written by the best scientists of the last 200 years. What do you have, except your ego?
dudev 1 day ago