Of verimice and strawmen
Loading...
Loading...
10:18
to my brother variablast pt 1by blackacidlizzard417 views- 8:37
Insultsby blackacidlizzard246 views
- 5:51
Intro to Anti-Statismby InTheEndIWasRight1,631 views
- 10:44
Judge as thou wilt part 1by blackacidlizzard215 views
- 10:19
Answers from an anarchist pt 1by blackacidlizzard478 views
- 7:41
re The weekly anarchist 1by blackacidlizzard407 views
- 4:51
The Demand Wizard: Why Command and Control Economics Failsby i2idotorg1,453 views
- 6:38
Voting pt. 1 - Futilityby blackacidlizzard137 views
- 2:59
Answers from an anarchist pt2by blackacidlizzard123 views
- 9:58
Obliterating Statist Myths Episode One: Anarchic vs. Statist Law and Justice (Part 3 of 5)by junior00bacon00chee1,648 views
- 6:36
rentFREEby FreeStateProjectNH3,921 views
- 3:02
A Basic Argument Against The Stateby InTheEndIWasRight3,075 views
- 4:10
The Detrimental Mutationby GuardofLiberty259 views
- 2:26
Stateless earth creature burns Social Security card, proclaims love for all humankindby syadasti2,710 views
- 8:36
The Matrix, the State, and the Enlightenmentby GuardofLiberty1,666 views
- 10:00
Response to variablast pt 1by GuardofLiberty224 views
- 9:18
The Unnecessary State (Rise of Civilization)by fringeelements3,511 views
- 7:29
How Governments Ariseby aaron0883392 views
- 5:15
A Civil Video to Someone Who Is NOT A Dumbassby spawktalk412 views
- 5:54
re: "Anarchy"by aaron0883375 views
i agree it pisses me off too, although most people do it innocently.
fps0chris 2 years ago
Good video buddy.
overmind25 2 years ago
Very logical and passionate. I agree with you.
The state has made it very difficult to sue polluters. Government agents have traditionally claimed "greater good of society" arguments to defend polluters.
Not to mention studies which cite the government sector as contributing the most to environmental damage.
machaeroguy 2 years ago
I am seriously starting to agree.
AlaskanAnarchist 2 years ago
it is always irritating if you have read hundreds of books and someone comes up to you and says:"anarchism would not work, because we would not have ... roads"
Like it never ever crossed your mind. Like you just start replicating all kinds of unfounded idiotic ideas, the moment someone tells them to you, without any thought.
Now I can understand why they assume that you do that. Because that is their world, so it is only natural they assume others parrot other's opinions as well.
modelmark 2 years ago
Perhaps. Maybe he just can't give the state up because it would shake his worldview to its foundations, and so his ignorance is willful.
But I think that's all part of the state's inertia.
GuardofLiberty 2 years ago
Plus, it doesn't matter if one buys into a subjective theory of morality, the fact is that different people have different opinions about it. So demanding that "immorality" be addressed, rather than the specific aspects the one asking the question may find to be immoral, is ridiculous.
Let's ask a Nazi why the free market is immoral.
"Because then people will trade with Jews."
For all of the information in vari's question, that could be the issue he wanted addressed.
blackacidlizzard 2 years ago
You're quite careful coming to conclusions.
From where I stand the ignorance seems willful. Willful action implies a goal.
blackacidlizzard 2 years ago
Well, that's something that I definitively can't say. I blame inertia. It's hard to see past the state wall.
GuardofLiberty 2 years ago
And when he approaches someone who tells him "the state is suboptimal for achieving the good that you want, and here's why." he sticks his fingers in his ears.
So is his goal really to achieve the good he proclaims to desire?
blackacidlizzard 2 years ago