(6 of 14) MAJOR REDUCTIONS IN CARBON EMISSIONS ARE NOT WORTH THE MONEY DEBATE: PHILIP STOTT
Loading...
2,783
Top Comments
see all
All Comments (7)
-
Well, one problem with his argument is the assumption that because past climate change Humans have survived, and because they survive in diverse climates today with a wide temperature differential, that an average increase in temperature all over the world must not be a problem.
That's some contorted logic. No one's ever said temperature increases will be the end of all Humanity, which he implies environmentalists argue.
-
all rhetoric and no facts. Watching this man is like watching pantomime
Loading...



Philip Stott is amazing
gangreneday 3 years ago 7
Clearly a logical appraisal. When 30 percent of the world is land and a handful of people think they can influence the climate, then mankind is full of its own swollen ego.
beasn 2 years ago 2