Tibet: An Issue of National Security

No description available.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• free
• tibet
• china
• media
• bias

[yobreakfast]

but if full national security is what china or the us wants by taking over countries... they may as well try taking over the world (wich they have economically, but still)... i mean, then you may as well have a NWO ;)

[hongster76]

tibet has been part of china since b4 the ching (mongol dynasty), infact the concept of the dalai lama was invented buy kublai khan

[hongster76]

i m sorry that i accidentally removed ur remark. i get ur point. but my point of this video is that if tibet is not chinese, it will be india's or the US.

tibet existed as a country b4 ching? it is disputable that border exist then, a there were no international law to define borders. my point is that its bee so long ago that it is now irrelevant. so tibet will never be 'free' if its not china, it is some other foreign nation, atleast china intention is for def, not a aggressive one

[yobreakfast]

no offence at all, I do understand your point... I do not agree with the Cultural revolution in many aspects, but I do agree some good has come out of it too (like, more equality for women, something unthinkable under the old system)... I wanted however to specify the broader implications, speaking beyond Tibet: if colonisation is the only way for security, (for any country!!!, US, Russia, whichever) then the only way is a one-world government in the end... is that a desirable one, to your mind?

[hongster76]

ofcuz not, but the point is to keep a balance.

do u honestly think tibet and its neighbours will be 'safer' with it 'independent' backed by US n western govs? or india for that matter, as we understand its strategic significance?

to put it in perspective, think Israel in palestine.

if one argues that israel had been a kingdom 2k yrs ago n is justified, then the New World (US/AU) belongs to asians, as far as human migration is concerned.

[madeye0]

I have a question for you, what do you think about marijuana and drug laws in general in China. I can imagine your first reaction would be that such petty topic isn't even relevant. Well it is very relevant and lively discussed in "western world". Why do you think that is? And on a bigger question, are you really a fan of totalitarian rule? This isn't a matter of international conflicts but small things affecting day to day life of common people.

[hongster76]

in ur next response, unless it has relates to topic, will be omitted

[yobreakfast]

Well, israel being "justified" is a matter of opinion I will not comment on, but its true that the New World belongs to originally to Asians, more specifically people of the mongoloid race, yes... most of us who live here are aware of that...But I'm not really understanding how that ties in to my point... what does it have to do with national security for the world??

[materialrainbow]

What does a panda say when it steps on a dead ant?! lol

[madeye0]

And by the way, I didn't have to check the rest of your vids now. I watched them long before and I have your "Gravity vortex bong tornado hits + Oolong Tea" in my favourites. :))

[madeye0]

I was pointing to lack of discussion in this matter, or any matter. Not the druglaw itself.

[madeye0]

I gave you my response it's above. By this question I simply tried to open more general discussion. It wasn't ad hominem argument get your terms straight, your hypothesis that I am biased "because of my personal experience" was good example of ad hominem argument. You are unnecesarily defensive. All the discussion threads above are terminated by my message, still you chose this one to respond.