Addressing HeavyTrafficAhead
Top Comments
Video Responses
All Comments (29)
-
@DarkSideOfWinter - Thank you.
I will... Ah... He IS being quite rude in there. I think he's not interested in a reasoned discussion. What a shame. Perhaps he'd be no good at it anyway, from the look of things.
He has no right to be trashing you, or anyother sex-rights activists. His only correct point was having the right to an opinion, if that opinion is flawed, well then everyone else has the right to tell him so. And there shouldn't be any bashing of them for doing it.
-
@PurpleGhost I apologize for the vagueness
At any rate this video did not merit his rudeness or his down right childish attacks on other sex-workers rights activists recently on twitter. He has been a down right fucktard there
twitter account "cehbeach"
Makes for a very interesting read
-
@DarkSideOfWinter You misunderstand, I was asking, because I didn't know what you were implying, your comment was too vauge for me to judge. I don't know you, so it was just the 'prepare for the worst' guess.
I think, describing any instance where you know someone /can/ be offended as "slightly inflamatory at worst" (Read 'slightly' and 'at worst') is fair. The situation does have possible emotional fallout.
Better not to assert others needs, with so little evidence of them.
-
@PurpleGhost Did I imply that? Nope. I was implying you haven't seen me kick ass. And it doesn't involve an ego trip like most people.
If you find me politely pointing out a flaw in his logic inflammatory, then girl, you have a lot of growing up to do
-
What are you trying to say?...That you'll kick *my* ass, for daring to suggest that fair and open discussion is preferable to ass kicking? O.o
I was replying to NewKhorne, who mentioned ass-kicking. I wasn't judging if you HAD, or HAD-NOT, provided 'an ass-kicking'; just stating that I do not think it is the answer.
If I had to judge, no the video is slightly inflamatory at worst. & As I stated before, the comments section, is merely rude.
Satisfied?
-
@PurpleGhost You think this polite video as asskicking
I'll show you asskicking
-
@NewKhorne - To correct myself, and be more clear: I meant, that was as close as he came to an insult (saying 'pozzies') and I'm guessing now that it must mean sex-positives.
Even still, I really can't see it as a reason to trash him and try to encite a worse argument. It's still trivial.
-
@NewKhorne Look, seriously, I have no idea what this is about, but his comments here were not 'asshat'ish. He was annoyed, but not impolite.
(I don't know what 'Pozzie' means, but I'm guessing that's what he was thinking was an insult?)
There's no need for you to be rude to him.
Ass-kicking, are not the remedy for disagreements, fair, open discussion is.
Encouraging beligerence should not be a part of it, please, consider that when dishing out insults so freely over something trival.
-
Well I think it's safe to say from his asshat reaction in the comments you gave him a well deserve ass kicking
-
@HeavyTrafficAhead When you consider the amount of money that went into campaigns like prop 8 from religious institutes, it's not like the pro's (you sanctimonious assole) have much influence or advertising power, and the men who run the porn industry have no interest in supporting sex worker rights. What's in it for them?
@HeavyTrafficAhead Can you be any more of an assole?
fatalerror404TV 1 month ago 5
@HeavyTrafficAhead "Which I don't hear you pozzies talk about all that much, if at all. Much to the detriment of your cause"
First of all your derogatory "Pozzie" helps... not
and second of all you clearly haven't been listening to them, which proves my point as they do talk about it, constantly
DarkSideOfWinter 1 month ago 5