Simon Sinek: How great leaders inspire action

http://www.ted.com Simon Sinek presents a simple but powerful model for how leaders inspire action, starting with a golden circle and the question "Why?" His examples include Apple, Martin Luther King, and the Wright brothers -- and as a counterpoint Tivo, which (until a recent court victory that tripled its stock price) appeared to be struggling.

TEDTalks is a daily video podcast of the best talks and performances from the TED Conference, where the world's leading thinkers and doers give the talk of their lives in 18 minutes. TED stands for Technology, Entertainment, Design, and TEDTalks cover these topics as well as science, business, development and the arts. Closed captions and translated subtitles in a variety of languages are now available on TED.com, at http://www.ted.com/translate.

Follow us on Twitter
http://www.twitter.com/tednews

Checkout our Facebook page for TED exclusives
https://www.facebook.com/TED

• Category

  Science & Technology

[RomansBookReport]

You can't tell the story of the Wring Brothers without talking about IP trolling. Their greatest innovation was a legal hammer to smash all competition using the patent office.

[John White]

Tablets, MP3 players, smart phones and laptops existed long before the iPad, iPod, iPhone and iBook. Apple is not innovative. They take the ideas of others, slap on new names intended to make them seem original, market them as fun alternatives to their invention of a corporately-crafted, stuffy, white, conservative, middle-aged man culture, and then triple the price.

[RomansBookReport]

When? Right before you called me a douchebag you implied that patents had some positive effect on society. There's no evidence of this whatsoever and there's a lot of evidence to the contrary. The fashion industry is a wonderful empirical example of the vibrancy, creativity, and innovation which happens without IP.

Ideas are not property. They are not "your own shit."

[Category120]

when did I say that patents improved societies innovation or wealth?

they're meant to protect the wealth of the individual - which comes as a result of a capitalistic society where individual ownership is prioritized.

maybe their patent did end up setting back innovation - doesn't mean they were wrong for wanting to patent their own work.

if you want a working democracy, individuals need a way to protect their own shit

[RomansBookReport]

The Wright brothers set American aviation so far back with their patent trolling that when WWI started, the US military had to buy planes from France.

Most of your comments are non-sequitors. Money exists therefor patents are okay. (WTF?)

There is no evidence whatsoever that patents improve innovation or a society's wealth. There is quite a bit of evidence to the contratry.

[Category120]

what's wrong with patenting something you invented? we live in a society where money exists, which means people have no choice but to protect their work and earnings.

if you want to live in a successful society where everyone is altruistic and never thinks about themselves then move to middle of the fuckin desert douchebag, because that place doesn't exist.

independence comes with a catch - don't bitch because people actually use it

[Category120]

he's talking about both. a leader needs to make people believe in what he has to say - so does an advertiser

[geoangle]

Tooth fairy. 

[Rafael Althaus]

Just apply this on talking with your employees. Talk about the mission and the vision on your company. Boom. You have what a truly leader do needs to ride a company. Motivation.

[jliller]

This video seems like a good explanation for how Obama got elected president.

[jliller]

People who stand in line overnight for fancy new technology do so because they're impatient.

[Ben Whitter]

Leadership is more meaningful and inspires people to create powerful movements...search for Tsunami Leadership to discover more.