Gisburne Discusses Atheist Morality

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,574
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Feb 15, 2007

We will not be silenced! Download and REupload!

http://gisburne.com

DOWNLOAD AND REUPLOAD!

  • likes, 137 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (59)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I miss seeing this blokes videos, though he wasnt the best speaker, his points were spot on all the time. Bring back NICK !

  • My moral belief is very simple and based only on two principles:

    -Respect

    -Decency

    Thats all. Easy.

    And I believe that I live a better life than some theists who bully people and treat them with disrespect during the week and then go to their place of worship on Sunday and all is forgiven so they can go out and continue with their normal lives.

  • Thank You! I was going to point out the very same thing about animals to Christians but I was sure one of them would pounce on me calling me a douche bag or some such thing as they commonly seem to do to others who question Gods existence and teachings. I was also sure they'd come back with something like... well animals act on instinct and not free will thus they are pre-programed to act a certain way, which is hogwash. Anyway, uncharacteristically, I left it unsaid.
  • What is your defenition of morality?

  • im not an athiest but lol all kangaroos are going to hell

  • All morality is bunk.

    watch?v=AVCd58U5FM8

  • So there you have it. I consider all arguments against religions useless unless this issue is addressed. In the religious mind, evidence isn't as important. An argument via evolution is utterly useless unless you first address which approach gets precedence. Should you believe things because of faith, or should you believe based on evidence.

  • A few months ago as I was discussing evolution with my conservative catholic father(who is getting his master's degree in some sort of theology), we were arguing about how the church is able to reconcile itself with evolution. Basically, the answer I got was pretty revealing and I'm sure I'll remember it for a damn long time. His argument, as it went, was basically this. "evolution is alright so long as it doesn't directly contradict Faith".

  • To ericdt7, I'd suggest considering other devious human behavior such as necrophilia, cannibalism, torture, lying, stealing, etc.

    I think this illustrates exactly why explaining the roots of morality via evolution(I think the argument in this video presupposes evolution is true) isn't effective against mainstream religions - they don't believe in evolution. However, when trying to explain evolution to religious folk, problems arise immediately.

  • And no, I don't subscribe to the idea that atheists are immoral, or lack judgement. I just have to wonder how one can adhere to an absolute morality, if the basis for moral laws is circumstantial and relative.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more