Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

ABSOLUTE PROOF IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR HHO TO INCREASE MILES PER GALLON

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
20,886
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Ratings have been disabled for this video.

Uploaded by on Jan 4, 2010

This video proves that 3.05 liters per minute of HHO only provides 4.1 TENTHS OF ONE PERCENT of the energy requirement of a 24.1 MPG vehicle at 60 MPH. It also proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that an HHO device robs more energy from the engine than it gives back to the engine.

STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS GOING AFTER OZZIE FREEDOM FOR DEFRAUDING 3200 PEOPLE IN TEXAS WITH HHO - SEEKING $20,000 FOR EACH VIOLATION

http://www.oag.state.tx.us/oagNews/release.php?id=2937

PICTURE OF RONN MOTORS CHASSIS

http://img137.imageshack.us/img137/3295/ronnmotors.jpg

PICTURE OF RONN MOTORS HHO CELL

http://www.ronnmotors.com/cms/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&a...

THE UNIT RONN MOTORS USES PACKED IN A PC BOX AND SELLS FOR $3500 TO $10000

http://www.hydrorunner.com/products.html


US DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY - The link below shows that per cubic foot, gasoline has 836000 BTU of energy. Gaseous hydrogen a wimpy 270 BTU and since HHO is only 2/3 hydrogen, an extremely wimpy 180 BTU. So gasoline has 4644 times more energy.

http://www1.eere.energy.gov/hydrogenandfuelcells/tech_validation/pdfs/fcm01r0...

BMW HYDROGEN 7 RUNS ON LIQUID HYDROGEN

http://www.insideline.com/bmw/7-series/2007/first-drive-2007-bmw-hydrogen-7.html


IDEAL GAS LAW CALCULATOR LINK

http://easycalculation.com/chemistry/ideal-gas.php

EFIE DEVICE FOR ENGINE WITH HHO IS ILLEGAL - $2500 FINE PER PERSON - $25000 FINE FOR A BUSINESS

http://www.epa.gov/compliance/resources/policies/civil/caa/mobile/engswitch.pdf

Here is a link that lets you calculate the needed horsepower to overcome wind drag at various speeds.

http://www.apexgarage.com/tech/horsepower_calc.shtml

TABLE OF ENERGY DENSITY OF FUELS

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_density

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (EnergySupply2008)

  • Is it possible, by use of catalysts, resonance, and other methods, to increase the production of HHO gas using less energy? Many, if not all, of the HHO generators are using some type of electrolytic mixture which may make the HHO production more efficient. I am certianly no chemist, and I agree with your assessment, but it may be that there are some components that should be considered in your equations, as you are assuming absolutely pure water, which we know is typically not what is used...

  • @JETTXEL They use distilled water to not gum up the plates, but distilled water will not conduct electricity, so they add electrolytic substances.

  • You totally missed the point of HHO. You have not done your correct research . HHO acts as a booster to the gas in your engine. About 75% (look it up) of energy is wasted when normal gas burns to heat and other factors. That leaves 25% efficiency. HHO Combines with the gas to help it burn more completely, giving you better milage. What you guys are thinking of is using HHO as straight fuel, not a chemical booster for gasoline/diesel. So both sides are correct, your just arguing different points!

  • @bennett20200 No, you missed the point. The numbers show that HHO wastes energy by loading the engine and the alternator. Using that energy to create HHO is a net loss.

see all

All Comments (149)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Great video, but you could have done it much simpler. All this talk about the ideal gas law is unncessary, all you need to show is that you can at best break even. How much energy does it consume to dissociate one mole of water, how much energy does that yield in a combustion? Where are the losses along the way.. bam, you end up with less. I think all the numbers are more confusing than anything else. But good video.

  • @tnlightnin The law of conservation of energy means you can never get out more energy than you put in. The extra load on the alternator to run the HHO devive causes the engine to have to work harder, which means more fuel consumption. Because it takes more energy to make the HHO than you get from burning it, it is an energy loser.

  • @EnergySupply2008 Apparently fear of posted comments? We have to have approval? Does anyone know which oil company Energysupply2008 is working for? This video was a lot of trouble to create for zero gain. And biased by judging HHO alone without the benefits it provides when combined with other fuels. Nor does he consider the alternator output and drag as part of the equation. Many alternators produce far more than the vehicles require. Nothing is ever proven by leaving out facts.

  • A nice contribution to the Truth and Normality.Good for you!

  • Bravo and thank you for the video. Entropy on a self contained chassis is by commonsense an automatic failure. Even if the auto makers and oil companies are in collusion your power companies aren't and if they could produce electricity cheaper or free to lower their expense of operation they would do it to make more money off of us.

  • @roofy2k Exactly, energy cannot be produced, only changed from one form to another, but always with efficiency losses.

  • thank you for posting this video, it's a tough one to crack for a lot of people because they think they're producing energy which everyone wants to do but just cant

View all Comments »
Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more