Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

McCain: Yes to Yucca, No to my backyard

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
3,001
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jul 29, 2008

http://www.progressiveaccountability.org

John McCain doesn't want nuclear waste in his backyard — but yours is just fine.

When asked "Would you be comfortable with nuclear waste coming through Arizona, you know, going through Phoenix on its way to Yucca Mountain?" John McCain's answer was clear: "No I would not."

But through your state — that's a different story. He's been a consistent supporter of storing waste at Yucca Mountain. In 1998, John McCain even voted in favor of shipping nuclear waste from New England to Texas. For his support the electric utility and Nuclear power industry has rewarded McCain with more than half a million dollars in campaign contributions.
Nuclear Power

McCain Has Accepted Over One Half A Million From The Electric Utility Industry, Nuclear Power Industry. According to a Public Campaign Action Fund analysis of campaign finance data provided by the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics Center, John McCain received $558, 365 in campaign contributions from the electric utility industry, which includes the nuclear power industry since 1989. [Center for Responsive Politics via Campaign Money Watch] * McCain Agreed "Nuclear Power Should Be Greatly Expanded." McCain, along with the rest of the Republican presidential candidates, "agree that nuclear power should be greatly expanded." [New York Times, 10/17/07]

Nuclear Waste: Okay For Nevada, Not For Arizona

McCain Said He Would Not Be Comfortable With Nuclear Waste Being Transported To Yucca Going Through Arizona. In an interview in Las Vegas, Senator McCain advocated for the storage of nuclear waste in Yucca Mountain. When asked "What about the transportation? Would you be comfortable with nuclear waste coming through Arizona, you know, going through Phoenix on its way to Yucca Mountain?" McCain: "No I would not." [McCain Interview, Accessed 4/3/08]

McCain Supports Nuclear Storing Nuclear Waste In Yucca Mountain: * McCain Said He Supported Yucca in Senate in 2002. The Las Vegas Review-Journal reported, "[McCain] says 'I think we have to have a place to store the waste. I think that nuclear power has got to be a vital part of our effort to be independent of foreign oil, and I think it's (Yucca Mountain) a suitable place for storage.' McCain said he had not been convinced that the site isn't safe or that transporting the waste to the site was unduly dangerous." [Las Vegas Review-Journal, 5/7/07] * McCain Has Been Consistent In His Support For Storing Nuclear Waste Within Yucca Mountain. The Las Vegas Sun reported, "John McCain has been consistent in his support for storing nuclear waste within Yucca Mountain. He has said publicly that tough decisions regarding nuclear waste have to be made and that storing nuclear waste over many different states is a larger national threat than storing all the waste at Yucca Mountain. He supports going forward with building more nuclear power plants and believes storing waste inside Yucca Mountain will streamline that cause." [Las Vegas Sun Voters Guide, Accessed 7/28/08] * McCain Voted to Dump Nuclear Waste at Yucca Mountain. In 2002, McCain voted for a motion to proceed to the resolution which, pursuant to the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, approves of the site at Yucca Mountain, Nevada for the development of a repository for the disposal of high-level radioactive waste and spent nuclear fuel. According to the Center for Responsive Politics, Nuclear Energy Institute was "the nuclear power industry's trade association, representing 260 corporations in 15 countries. NEI is reportedly the mastermind behind the Alliance for Sound Nuclear Policy, a coalition of pro-nuclear groups." [S.J. Res 34, Vote #167, 7/09/02]

McCain Voted In Favor Of Shipping Nuclear Waste From New England To Texas. In 1998, McCain voted in favor of legislation granting Congressional consent to an agreement allowing Maine and Vermont to send low-level radioactive waste to a dump site in Texas. The conference report passed 78-15. [H.R. 629, Vote #255, 9/2/1998]

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 4 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (16)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Nuclear waste will not harm the planet - heck, it's from the planet! It'll just harm people...

  • Antontellingfibbs. 2 . No need to demolish the plant and quarantine the site. You just need to upgrade/modernize the reactors about every 50 years. Hell you can keep it operating for centuries. Not that it matters much but nuclear waste after 10,000 years of radioactive decay the waste is harmless...not 100,000 as you mentioned.

  • Antontellingfibbs. 1. Nuclear waste will not harm the "planet" because the waste will be confined to a very small area. To give you some perspective the area for the waste proposed Yucca repository is 2.2 sq. miles vs the entire USA has 3,536,294 square miles. (that's 0.000062%). in other words your fear about harm to the planet is completely irrational. Yes that 2.2 sq mi will be unusable for anything else, but the area is sparsely populated & inhospitable anyway. (ever been to Vegas in July?)

  • McCain is an idiot!

    Nuclear reactors and waste will harm the planet FAR more in the long run than oil and shit we have going now.

    When a nuclear powerplant has reached the end of its lifetime (40-55yrs), You cant demolish it before 110-120yrs has past since the shut-down.

    And nuclear waste isnt harmless before 100 000years have passed.

    And what if a plant or two in the usa becomes terror-targets, and they succeed? Answer: youre fucked.

  • Nevada is down with the blue states now!

  • Drilling is pointless it will barely effect oil prices and wont take effect until nearly 2025. Even then it will have an effect of around 5cents per gallon. By then we should be off oil according to our so called Politicians. All it will do is give oil companies more money for their wallets. Nuclear plants cost 500million to a billion each and are expensive to maintain. To get a permit for one nuclear plant takes 10 around years so McCain is bullshitting when he says that. McCain is a LIE!

  • Look at that reporter's shoes! Is that acceptable in the south West?

  • of course not!! douche!

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more