Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Pelosi at Netroots abstinence-only question

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi answered a question about abstinence-only policies at Netroots Nation this morning. She called them out as being dangerous, saying that Congress needs more pro-choice mem...  
 
Customize

More From: prochoiceamerica

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Featured Videos

20 ratings
Sign in to rate
4,102 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (55)   Options

Loading...
thanc2002 (8 months ago) Show Hide
+2
Marked as spam
You say I am pushing my morals on you? you are darn skippy I am! I have the right to do so. You people keep pushing your lack of morals on us and think that because the ACLU has taken your side and political correctness has raised its ugly head in America that we as God fearing Christians and others who see this lifestyle as what it is (un-natural) have to give in to you. let me tell you this; we have not yet begun to fight. But it is comming. Count on that!
thanc2002 (8 months ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
well thatcher88, I fought, my father fought and my brother fought in the service of this great country of ours. Free speech is part of what we cherish in the USA. I will say whatever I feel is right and just.
thatcher88 (9 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Don't impose your morals on others- the reality is sex occurs outside marriage, so who says that is not 'intended to be'- only the majority.
williwo (9 months ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
You mean the right to murder? And it's not just "YOUR" body. There's someone else inside of there as well. What about their rights? Who will speak for them? And your mom COULD have aborted you if she wanted. And my mom COULD have aborted me. That doesn't make it right by any means.
thatcher88 (9 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
How can you force a woman to go through childbirth? If you don't allow abortion, won't an adamant woman just get an unsafe abortion that will harm or even kill her and most certainly destroy the possible life? A woman doesn't need the permission of others to abort part of her body- the scientific community have determined a safe period in which to abort and a period when the developing fetus will not be conscious or in. You can't 'murder' a developing fetus; murder extends to a developed human.
williwo (9 months ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
Are you saying that a one-year old is a developed human?? How come that it counts as murder if the child is out of the womb for only ten minutes? Why isn't it murder 10 minutes BEFORE the abortion? Shouldn't then a woman be allowed to dispose of a child after birth if she wishes? Why isn't that allowed? After all, it came from "HER" body, right? Like those who tryed to defend slavery in the 1850's, you are on the wrong side of history. The CHILD's rights must be protected as well.
thatcher88 (9 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
But unborn children aren't killed 10 minutes before abortion. Embryos are aborted usually one or two trimesters after conception. They have no awareness of their abortion. And don't compare this to slavery, there is no similarity, particularly when your the conservative.
williwo (9 months ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
I Most certainly WILL compare this to slavery. There is a time to be liberal and a time to be conservative. And in case you aren't aware, there is a thing called "partial birth-abortion". And this does compare to slavery. Both are horrid evils. Scientific studies have shown that the child does feel pain based on reactions. And who are you to say they have no awareness? Would you say that a six month old would not have any awareness if it was killed?
williwo (9 months ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
It seems that people such as yourself wish to be liberal in all areas even if it is wrong. You reject balance in favor of Far-Left Radicalism. You shun one evil while you defend another. You speak of the person inside as if it were some organ. When in fact, you yourself were once in that stage. I question whether it would've been ok with you if you yourself had been aborted. Why don't you try looking through the child's eyes for once and realize they are being punished for nothing they did.
thatcher88 (9 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
I am not liberal. The majority of the scientific community have accepted that it neither causes pain to the potential life nor harms the mother. The majority of social and family planning workers find abortion to be the inevitable choice of the mother, and they can hope only that she does it safely. With the majority of qualified scientists, and qualified social workers, who defends abortion? Few, often left field scientists, a minority of social workers and a surplus of unqualified moralists.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.