Judge Drops TSA Breast Grab Charges

From: http://video.foxnews.com/v/1052399640001/new-police-department-tool-sparks-pr...

July 19, 2011 - Colorado woman accused of squeezing the breast of federal agent will not face felony charges.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This video may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes only. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 106A-117 of the U.S. Copyright Law.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Judge
• Drops
• TSA
• Breast
• Grab
• Charges
• PigMine3
• PigMine2
• Webster
• Tarpley
• Federaljacktube6
• RonPaulFriends
• Steve
• Paul
• Joseph
• Watson
• George
• Noory
• Police
• Brutality
• Beatings
• 911
• Truth
• New
• World
• Order
• Prison
• Planet
• Infowars
• Aaron
• Dykes
• Bilderberg
• Illuminati
• Afghanistan
• Iraq
• War
• Andrew
• Napolitano

[screwopenborders]

I like that judge, I think he understands how over the top these screenings are and that the American people do not want them!

[campaign4liberty]

Ron Paul vs. Big Brother 2012

The Choice Is Clear

news LibertyPoet(dot)com

[cnknguyen]

Fuck the TSA, dont like that statement? well FUCK YOU TOO!

[ColonPal]

@jeffiek -- The insane bitch in the video assaulted someone with ZERO provocation, grabbed her breast and twisted it, a SEXUAL ASSAULT, and you cheer her on and have the audacity to call me 'immoral'?!?

Better take a look at the SOCIOPATH in your mirror fuck-tard!

The ONLY people who would ever be patted down are those who ASK to be patted down, which shows just how little you know about security at the airports. You really don't get out much, do you?

Sure you don't spit on soldiers returning?

[jeffiek]

@ColonPal So now your true colors start to show. You just want to hit 61 year old ladies.

You don't have the nerve to see actual evidence of TSA molesting children.

Just how thick is your skull? The TSA has no right to search anyone. Their actions are immoral for ANYONE. NO ONE gets to exempt themselves from morality by putting on a costume and taking a paycheck from thugs. And you're just as guilty by supporting them.

[ColonPal]

@jeffiek -You're right for once! I didn't watch your 'video'. I could only HOPE TSA would assault someone the way they've been treated. Had the Asian bitch have grabbed my tit I'd have laid her out on the floor unconscious and thought nothing of it. You don't put your hands on someone without expecting retaliation. Of course that is unless you're being searched which gives the searcher every right they need to be sure you're unarmed.

If you don't want to be touched, go thru the harmless scanner.

[jeffiek]

@ColonPal You didn't watch the video I linked to, did you? Only a pathetic loser could watch that and not be disgusted.

No, I'm not calling you names. I'm using adjectives. I am describing WHAT YOU ARE.

And you are entitled to any delusional belief you like. I fully respect that right.

Unlike you, I don't shove guns down peoples throats when they have different beliefs.

Beliefs such as dignity, morality, non-violence, and liberty.

[ColonPal]

@jeffiek -- I also refuse to debate the topic any further with you resorting to name-calling like a teenaged brat.

You are entitled to any delusional belief you like. I will continue to file my complaints with the gov. WITH the gov instead of blaming those who aren't responsible.

[ColonPal]

@jeffiek -- I'm sorry sir, but I really don't recall having asked you a thing about my balls, but while we're on the subject, you can kiss them if you'd like and I wouldn't complain.

I also don't speak to 'government', because I wouldn't know quite how to do that in any kind of point of action. Maybe you can clarify: exactly how DOES someone 'whine to the gov.'?? Are you trying to say I've written letters to them and told them to beef up security? If so, do you have proof of any such 'whining'?

[ColonPal]

@jeffiek -- THANK YOU! Even the definition YOU come up with would rule out a pat-down as assault! Thanks for winning my own argument against you. That made you look even more foolish than you already appear.

This is the reason why TSA has nearly ANY actual convictions against them.

There's not a sane lawyer in the US who would damage his career by trying to argue that a pat-down is 'assault', which is why none have yet to try suing TSA.