Let Me In International trailer

Let Me In trailer

Category:

Film & Animation

Tags:

• let
• me
• in
• trailer

[aqworldsplayer100]

Here are things I will say to you if you say the following:

"This scene sucks! Its better in LTROI!", I don't give a fuck if you think its better in LTROI.

"The actors here suck! They're better in LTROI!", Whatever, some people are fans of these two young actors in LMI, they're basicly world-famous so what're you to say to that? Nothing bitch.

"The Original is way better! This just just a remake!" So? You're a remake of someone who lived hundreds of years ago. You just got Fucked.

[crazymauler]

@IH8CREEPERS depends on your definition of good things. there are things left out of LMI that i liked and things i wish they might have put in, but alot of movies do that or are like that. Its all opinion but i personally liked LMI better for what they did with it and not saying i dont like LTROI it was good also. I just find it funny how people say its excatly the same movie but they hate LMI, how could you hate it if its "the same thing".

[HarpoSpoke]

@robi2000 neither film made much money. Both were made for money. Some of the same producers who produced LTROI also produced LMI. So you can't claim they were motivated by art on one and then changed their attitude for the other one.

[aqworldsplayer100]

@robi2000 I'd like to point out that Mat Reeves, the director of Let Me In turned down remaking it until he read the Novel and wrote to the original Author John Ajvide Lindqvist. John then replied back and didn't object to a remake only two years later and actually had asked Mat if he could put Hakan/Thomas not dying at all, but coming back to life as like in the novel. So yes, you are partially correct with "They only made it for money" but Mat also remade it because he liked the story.

[robi2000]

@HarpoSpoke not nearly or in any way does that mean what you wrote. People take a good thing - (the original) and remake it for extra cash - it's in the multiMillions.

[aqworldsplayer100]

@yolotzinify The whole point of the movie is to show that no matter how old you are, how different you are, or how much you've been through you can always find love. Owen was a bullied kid who had a horrible life, he had no friends due to he being the lone child in the complex, until Abby; a two hundred year old vampire girl moves in next to him and even though she knows they can't be friends they grow closer and closer. She is like a completely different species then him and yet they have love.

[yolotzinify]

i didnt get the point of this movie -_____-

[HarpoSpoke]

@robi2000 That would of course mean that both films were made for money.

[robi2000]

remember, the rights to remake this film were given by the originators - it's about more money

[HarpoSpoke]

@robi2000 Again....no way Hammer remakes a movie that made just $11 million worldwide if they were ONLY interested in money. The public is not going to line up to buy tickets to this story obviously.

They would have made another torture porn movie if that's all they were interested in. Those are cheaper to make and the public loves them. Pure profit.

[robi2000]

@HarpoSpoke U must have missread my comment. It was re-made because of money. The original is for art , the remake- for money. who the hell makes a remake just a few years later ? Oh that's right, because of money.