solution to the enigma,video test 2004 the mystery should have been solve a long time ago but makers of camcorder didn't care and scientist were onto denial,debunking,accustion of hoax or auther shortsighted explanation .
This is in WIKIPEDIA along with a picture of dozens of "rods"-More pple using these pretty hitec recorders "... investigators have shown that rods are mere tricks of light which result from how images (primarily video images) of flying insects are recorded and played back. In particular, the fast passage before the camera of an insect flapping its wings has been shown to produce rodlike effects, due to motion blur, if the camera is shooting with relatively long exposure times"
I did see myself some rod larve in pond water!!!....no, really, as you say this nonsense should have disappeared when Mars got as big as the full moon that August!!! Someone should post side-by-side video from several video cameras AND a film camera, shooting same scene, same time, with a control reference visible in all media..why don't people just try the speed settings on THEIR OWN CAMCORDERS, people ,prove it to yourselves...because they WANT to believe, credulity, blind faith, not good...
OMFG!!!!!!!! DID YOU SEE ALL THOSE RODS????? But what I want to know is, what the hell happened to the bugs? Did the rods scare them off? If so, should we be scared too????
I'm glad to see there are people who know about cameras and physics! When a fast moving, lit object flies in front of a lens, there will most often be a blur or doubles after it (especially with slow shutter speeds, slow-mo, and night settings. Nice debunk!
fake
SkemeKOS 2 months ago
This is in WIKIPEDIA along with a picture of dozens of "rods"-More pple using these pretty hitec recorders "... investigators have shown that rods are mere tricks of light which result from how images (primarily video images) of flying insects are recorded and played back. In particular, the fast passage before the camera of an insect flapping its wings has been shown to produce rodlike effects, due to motion blur, if the camera is shooting with relatively long exposure times"
arcadia4819 5 months ago
@TheWanderinSoul
no, the bugs sense the camera setting change and shape shift INTO rods silly.
Thopter 5 months ago
genius.
thedemoninmybrain 6 months ago
I did see myself some rod larve in pond water!!!....no, really, as you say this nonsense should have disappeared when Mars got as big as the full moon that August!!! Someone should post side-by-side video from several video cameras AND a film camera, shooting same scene, same time, with a control reference visible in all media..why don't people just try the speed settings on THEIR OWN CAMCORDERS, people ,prove it to yourselves...because they WANT to believe, credulity, blind faith, not good...
corndab 9 months ago
OMFG!!!!!!!! DID YOU SEE ALL THOSE RODS????? But what I want to know is, what the hell happened to the bugs? Did the rods scare them off? If so, should we be scared too????
TheWanderinSoul 1 year ago 2
I'm glad to see there are people who know about cameras and physics! When a fast moving, lit object flies in front of a lens, there will most often be a blur or doubles after it (especially with slow shutter speeds, slow-mo, and night settings. Nice debunk!
drewkeener 1 year ago
k those are all bugs attracted to the light source and creating a streaks of light on the camera if anyone disagrees then you 100% retarded
trousersnake7 1 year ago
You may be on to something
Heath75032 2 years ago
look at all those moths:)
alex95187 2 years ago