Nancy Pelosi and Newt Gingrich Commercial on Climate Change
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like Nate Allen's video.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike Nate Allen's video.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add Nate Allen's video to your playlist.
Uploaded on Apr 17, 2008
This ad is part of the "We Can Solve It" global warming ad campaign sponsored by former Vice President Al Gore's Alliance for Climate Protection.
It is no secret that Nancy Pelosi and Newt Gingrich don't always see eye to eye, but they do agree that on the issue of climate change, we must take action now.
Please join more than one million others who know it will take all of us coming together to solve the climate crisis.
-
Category
-
License
Standard YouTube License
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
The interactive transcript could not be loaded.
Loading...
Loading...
Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.
Loading...
Loading...
Top Comments
B1o2e3rg4e5r6 1 year ago
TO THE MOOOOON, NANCY!!!
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
JohnLocke2012 1 year ago
if Gingrich is the GOP nominee, I hope the Mayans were right
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Video Responses
All Comments (550)
perfectbark 6 months ago
From Time Mag:
Last October, Rick Santorum gave an interview with an Evangelical blog called Caffeinated Thoughts, in which he said contraception is “not okay,” and that this would be a public policy issue he would tackle as President.
One of the things I will talk about that no President has talked about before is I think the dangers of contraception in this country, the whole sexual libertine idea. Many in the Christian faith have said, “Well, that’s okay. Contraception’s okay."
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
perfectbark 6 months ago
and you're an illiterate uneducated reactionary religious religious zealot
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
perfectbark 6 months ago
reactionary noun
Definition
a person who is opposed to political or social change or new ideas
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
perfectbark 6 months ago
re·ac·tion·ar·y [ree-ak-shuh-ner-ee] Show IPA adjective, noun, plural re·ac·tion·ar·ies.
adjective
1.
of, pertaining to, marked by, or favoring reaction, especially extreme conservatism or rightism in politics; opposing political or social change.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
perfectbark 6 months ago
re·ac·tion·ary
adjective \rē-ˈak-shə-ˌner-ē\
Definition of REACTIONARY
: relating to, marked by, or favoring reaction; especially : ultraconservative in politics
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
war1980 6 months ago
"and what else can I say but spend a few years taking biology courses"
Is that going to explain how a child that doesnt meet the criteria for an abortus is an abortus because you hate the father?
You dont know his wife wasnt told she couldnt conceive.
You dont know his wife wasnt on contraceptive.
Youre a clueless douchebag thats done nothing but make assumptions based upon your own bias.
The only reactionary lowlife that needs to disappear into obscurity is you.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
perfectbark 6 months ago
Well your Fox network is a 24 hour hoax and your fellow religious nuts believed you were going to win the election. So you guys now have your own propaganda network to get your misinformation from. Republicans are not known for their science and math acumen as evinced by your complete misunderstanding of Human Reproductive biology.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
perfectbark 6 months ago
and what else can I say but spend a few years taking biology courses. Your religious beliefs are leading you to the wrong conclusions.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
perfectbark 6 months ago
he's a religious lowlife for irresponsibly allowing his aging wife to become pregnant. The "loss" of the conceptus is nature's way of preventing life where there will be a 0 percent probability of survival. And because of the gestational age of 20 weeks or less it is an abortus with 0 percent chance of survival. It is developmentally non-viable, won't even make it to normal infancy.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
war1980 6 months ago
Way to reference a study thats 20 years old.
Santorums child failed both requirements to be called an abortus, weight less than 500g and gestation period under 20 weeks.
But its all irrelevent, he lost his child, and you call him a low life for mourning the lose.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube