@McLarenMercedes There are actually other ways to test science than on animals. There are other methods, it's just that torturing animals is the cheapest way. Ex. DNA-manipulation. I would be really happy about myself if I infact was a part of stopping this cruelty, and that ment that I had to die for it, well so be it.
Hope you get some nasty disease and suffer for years in pain. Then every single day you suffer, you can be glad you're saving the lives of a few lab animals that could save you and millions of other from that suffering.
Congratulation, you're an idiot who doesn't see the big picture.
STOP TESING ON ANIMALS PLZ.... WHY DONT U TEST ON COMPUTER ??????????????? ITS EASIER .... AND NEW TOGNOLOGYYY ... PLZ TRY ON MAKE NEW COMPUTER FOR TESTING CHAMICALS.....
@ibanezplayer056 The US National Cancer Institute undertook a 25 year screening programme, testing 40,000 plant species on animals for anti-tumour activity. Out of the outrageously expensive research, many positive results surfaced in animal models, but not a single benefit emerged for humans. As a result, the NCI now uses human cancer cells for cytotoxic screening
Handbook of Laboratory Animal Science, Volume II Animal Models Svendensen and Hau CRC Press 1994 p4curedisease. net mrmcmedorg
has to end,,,right now
superbeauthy 1 week ago in playlist Boycott d 1% . III.
PASAD EL VIDEO JODER,ESTOS VIDEOS NO PUEDEN TENER 2000 REPRODUCIONES................
HAY TIENEN LA REALIDAD MIRAD LO QUE LE ACEN ALOS ANIMALES ESOS PUTOS PSICOPATAS DE LA ELITE Y EL SISTEMA ACTUAL
erkanutazo 4 weeks ago
@McLarenMercedes they dont stop teasting them ?
funnydrawer 1 month ago
@McLarenMercedes There are actually other ways to test science than on animals. There are other methods, it's just that torturing animals is the cheapest way. Ex. DNA-manipulation. I would be really happy about myself if I infact was a part of stopping this cruelty, and that ment that I had to die for it, well so be it.
xThisGirl95x 1 month ago
@xThisGirl95x
Hope you get some nasty disease and suffer for years in pain. Then every single day you suffer, you can be glad you're saving the lives of a few lab animals that could save you and millions of other from that suffering.
Congratulation, you're an idiot who doesn't see the big picture.
McLarenMercedes 1 month ago
@funnydrawer
Does NOT work.
Dream on.
McLarenMercedes 1 month ago
hahah and it comes from PETA!
SniperSurkov 2 months ago
STOP TESING ON ANIMALS PLZ.... WHY DONT U TEST ON COMPUTER ??????????????? ITS EASIER .... AND NEW TOGNOLOGYYY ... PLZ TRY ON MAKE NEW COMPUTER FOR TESTING CHAMICALS.....
funnydrawer 5 months ago
pordios nooo es muy horrible
sweettybunny 1 year ago
@ibanezplayer056 The US National Cancer Institute undertook a 25 year screening programme, testing 40,000 plant species on animals for anti-tumour activity. Out of the outrageously expensive research, many positive results surfaced in animal models, but not a single benefit emerged for humans. As a result, the NCI now uses human cancer cells for cytotoxic screening
Handbook of Laboratory Animal Science, Volume II Animal Models Svendensen and Hau CRC Press 1994 p4curedisease. net mrmcmedorg
sciencenotrats 1 year ago 2