1940 HMS Repulse
Top Comments
All Comments (58)
-
@robinhood48 Well put.
-
lol 1940's sound fx
-
was Force Z meant to cover Hong Kong as well?
-
You know exactly what I meant. Don´t try to be witty.
-
@robinhood48 Lol, your calling war "good old times". People dying, faving fun... :D
-
@greg71579 I believe they did understand.. The carrier HMS Indomitable was supposed to support them but it ran aground in the Caribbean so they had to go without.
-
i just dont like the fact the brits openly told the japs "LOOK WE ARE HERE" as soon as the jap knew what they were dealing with ... goodbye
-
The commander disobeyed orders - was told to take the ships to Australia. There was no RAF CAP, when the ships were in RAF range. RAF fighters mixing it with the lumbering Japanese bombers would have been a very different matter.
The Brits fully understood naval warfare. The USA built large Iowa class ships. The obsolescence of battleships was only fully realized about a years later. The first lesson was when Ark Royal's planes helped sink the Bismark about 10 months before sinking
-
perhaps even more profound was that the allies learned the Force Z and Pearl Harbour lessons and used Battleships in second line roles from then on (after Force Z no allied Battleships/Battlecruisers were lost in action), however the Japanese continued to send their own Battleships out without carrier or air cover. They even believed as late as 1943 that their capital ships could beat America's in a decisive line engagement.
-
This large ship along with Prince of Wales, were no match for the Japanese G4MI. Aircraft and Carriers were the true potent weapons of the Pacific. Too bad the British didn't understand that and sent these two ships out without any RAF protection.
HMS Repulse was a Great ship.
RMSTitanic87 2 years ago 17
Wonderful ship. Hard fighting, hard dying, a symbol of good old times and values.
robinhood48 3 years ago 4