@dodgeysmith1 4. You seem to be doing a lot of assuming which is the basis for your arguments deconstruction. Again nobody is afraid of homosexuals or homosexuality.
5. Homosexuality does not happen in nature as I've just went on a comment rampage full of information deconstructing such claims. you gave me a site with an article with animals not in their natural habitat influenced with human intervention which defeats the purpose of "in nature".
@dodgeysmith1 3. I went far beyond simply parts not fitting don't be a simpleton. tattoos are also not good for the body and there are many risks in getting them. You've just stated a red herring fallacy. You've gone from a a topic discussing fitting parts working like they're supposed to to getting a tatoo where there are many risks.
Getting a tattoo and homo sex is in the same category, not intended and several risks.
@dodgeysmith1 2. There are actually a few atheists against same sex marriage which makes your point still invalid. and it has nothing to do with being afraid of homosexuals or homosexuality because nobody is afraid of them or it.
@dodgeysmith1 Same sex marriage is an extra special right because it is not governed by the people while the people pay for it. It is also extra special because it gives no right to people to marry more than one person (polygamy) nor does it give the right for people to marry in the family (incestuous). I mention whatever the hell I want to mention on my channel YOU on the other hand don't mention your failed argument.
@dodgeysmith1 It doesn't matter where they came from the fact that another set of penguins broke up is evidence against your claims. Furthermore again the very definition of nature involves NO human contact or influence which disqualifies your NYC penguins
4. When I brought up choice I assumed that would be your next arguement, as most homophobes use it. However you surprised me by not resorting to that. Kudos to you.
5. Homosexuality does happen in the natural world, I emplore you to visit the site I mentioned. I would have posted the link, but it wouldn't let me for some reason. And if something happens in nature it must be natural, as primates and dolphins exibit homosexual orientation in nature. And there is one species
3. You say something about the parts not fitting, well you must forget how creative we humans can be with our bodies. Our skin isn't ment to be stained with ink but we do that anyway, our skin isn't supposed to have needles poked through it and we do that anyway, and our bodies most certainly wernt meant to be sitting around all day but we do that anyway. So unless you feel like going on a crusade against tattoos, peircings, and laziness. I suggest you rethink this arguement.
@dodgeysmith1 Your arguments are recycled and boring, I have better things to do with such limited time
Krazie316 1 year ago
@dodgeysmith1 4. You seem to be doing a lot of assuming which is the basis for your arguments deconstruction. Again nobody is afraid of homosexuals or homosexuality.
5. Homosexuality does not happen in nature as I've just went on a comment rampage full of information deconstructing such claims. you gave me a site with an article with animals not in their natural habitat influenced with human intervention which defeats the purpose of "in nature".
Krazie316 1 year ago
@dodgeysmith1 3. I went far beyond simply parts not fitting don't be a simpleton. tattoos are also not good for the body and there are many risks in getting them. You've just stated a red herring fallacy. You've gone from a a topic discussing fitting parts working like they're supposed to to getting a tatoo where there are many risks.
Getting a tattoo and homo sex is in the same category, not intended and several risks.
Krazie316 1 year ago
@dodgeysmith1 2. There are actually a few atheists against same sex marriage which makes your point still invalid. and it has nothing to do with being afraid of homosexuals or homosexuality because nobody is afraid of them or it.
Krazie316 1 year ago
@dodgeysmith1 Same sex marriage is an extra special right because it is not governed by the people while the people pay for it. It is also extra special because it gives no right to people to marry more than one person (polygamy) nor does it give the right for people to marry in the family (incestuous). I mention whatever the hell I want to mention on my channel YOU on the other hand don't mention your failed argument.
Krazie316 1 year ago
@dodgeysmith1 No they are not bisexual. Your response is lame and unfounded and basseless
Krazie316 1 year ago
@dodgeysmith1 It doesn't matter where they came from the fact that another set of penguins broke up is evidence against your claims. Furthermore again the very definition of nature involves NO human contact or influence which disqualifies your NYC penguins
Krazie316 1 year ago
@Krazie316 in which each individual is bisexual.
dodgeysmith1 1 year ago
@Krazie316
4. When I brought up choice I assumed that would be your next arguement, as most homophobes use it. However you surprised me by not resorting to that. Kudos to you.
5. Homosexuality does happen in the natural world, I emplore you to visit the site I mentioned. I would have posted the link, but it wouldn't let me for some reason. And if something happens in nature it must be natural, as primates and dolphins exibit homosexual orientation in nature. And there is one species
dodgeysmith1 1 year ago
@Krazie316
3. You say something about the parts not fitting, well you must forget how creative we humans can be with our bodies. Our skin isn't ment to be stained with ink but we do that anyway, our skin isn't supposed to have needles poked through it and we do that anyway, and our bodies most certainly wernt meant to be sitting around all day but we do that anyway. So unless you feel like going on a crusade against tattoos, peircings, and laziness. I suggest you rethink this arguement.
dodgeysmith1 1 year ago