Mozart Piano Concerto 20 (2/4) On Period Instruments
Uploader Comments (elias12186)
All Comments (13)
-
Mozart = Mazter
-
@elias12186 the candenza was written about 20 years later and the piano chenged quite a bit
-
Wonderful! Thank you for uploading this.
-
@elias12186 the version that plays ivan klansky has a really great cadenza, a little different from beeth's one.
-
Plus, in this case we know that Beethoven played this concerto himself, and added cadenzas as we would expect...
-
Nice playing here!
I have a comment on what you're discussing. In this work, there is a lot of 'Beethoven' texture (see for example mvt. 3), so the cadenza sounds fine in my view... After all, it's not that bad to play some Mozart in a more 'Beethovenian' style, some Scarlatti in a more 'Handelian' style etc. The HIP is about playing appropriately within the period and the 'school' of the work. Some personal deviations are welcome!
-
Yeah that's true... but seeing as the authentic performance movement claims to be all about recreating the sound that the composer himself had in mind, I would expect them to make the same effort in choosing the actual notes that they play.
-
well beethoven's piano was very close to mozart's so.... there is no problem :P
-
Thank you for the explanation on this musical work.
-
I don't know about you but my imagination reels at wondering what Mozart played on the piano that day. He probably meant to astound and amaze and bring up the spirit of the occasion, and felt like doing so-- and did,...
Just a little question--if the use of period instruments is an effort towards authenticity, why the Beethoven cadenza? I mean, I personally love the Beethoven cadenza and think this sounds great as a whole, but I had been expecting something a bit shorter and more improvisatory.
Cherodar 3 years ago
Word. I am tired of hearing the same cadenzas over and over.
elias12186 3 years ago