Incest and Five Bloody footprints..(David Bain trial day four)..

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
2,046
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 10, 2009

David Bain retrial (Five Bloody footprints) Day 4
.Bain family members were seen doing repairs on their house in Every Street, Dunedin, on the weekend of the shooting in which five of them were killed.

A neighbour told David Cullen Bain's trial of seeing three of them working on the house on the Saturday, two days before the bodies were discovered.

Neighbour Wayne Marsh said the run-down house was an issue because the father, Robin Bain, did not want to spend any money on it, while his wife Margaret wanted it demolished and a new house built.

He referred to a rift in the family because there was no money to build a new house.

He saw Robin and David Bain, and 14-year-old Stephen, working on repairing spouting around the house on the Saturday, two days before the killings in June 1994.

It was the last time he saw them. He said he had seen and heard nothing at the time of the killings.

David Bain faces charges of murdering five members of his family.

The defence contends that his father Robin carried out the murders and then shot himself.

During his cross-examination of retired Detective Senior Sergeant James Doyle, lead defence counsel Michael Reed QC asked about a psychologist's report on Robin Bain which had not been followed up.

A school psychologist described him as looking terrible, haggard, grey, depressed and much older than his age.

Mr Reed told the court that the bloody footprints through the house had been photographed but the photographs had not come out, so the crown now only had the measurements that were taken.

Mr Reed put to him that what was under the fingerprints found on the rifle had never been tested, but a recent test done on a splash beside the fingerprints had shown that it was not human blood.

Mr Reed also said the jury had been told at the first trial that the glasses found were David Bain's and a lens from them was found in his brother Stephen's room, even though an optometrist wanted to change his statement before trial to say that they were glasses ofthe mother, Margaret Bain.

The optometrist had seen photographs and they were not David's glasses.

The photograph used in the first trial to say where the lens was found was actually later found to show a reflection, and the notebook entry recorded the lens in a different place.

Family albums had gone missing or been destroyed. They may have shown who was the owner of the green jersey that the police say the killer was wearing. David Bain said it belonged to his father.

Mr Reed contended that new evidence would show that it was impossible that Robin Bain was kneeling and praying when David allegedly shot him from behind a curtained alcove in the same room.

He also asked about police inquiries about the mobile phone used by Laniet, David Bain's sister who was among those killed.

The police went to Telecom for phone records and were told that they were not available, but were later told that they would cost $3000 to access. This was not followed up.

In answer to questions by crown prosecutor Kieran Raftery, Mr Doyle said Robin Bain's fingernail scrapings and a smear slide with traces of blood had been returned to police from the ESR.

When items were returned after examination, it meant they were not needed for more testing.

The trial was told yesterday about samples being destroyed a year after the first trial.

Mr Doyle was shown two statements from a neighbour, which had been referred to in evidence yesterday.

In both statements she referred to seeing the paperboy - David Bain - outside the house at 6:45am.

The defence is pointing to the timing as crucial for potentially ruling out David Bain as being the person who turned on the family computer and left a message on the screen.

This morning Michael Reed QC also questioned Mr Doyle about five bloody footprints found in the hallway of the Bain family home.

In the first trial the Crown said that whoever these footprints belonged to was the killer and that the footprints belonged to David Bain.

The Defence this morning told the court that the footprints measured 270mm in length and that David Bains foot measures 300mm.

Mr Doyle admitted that at the time of the killings they measured Robyn Bains foot and found that it measured 270mm.

NZPA

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (0)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more