A crucial aspect of the CHRIS architecture is that the integrated system is portable to the different robot development sites. A second and perhaps more exciting aspect, is that as information is acquired by one robot through human interaction, that knowledge can be shared with other robots that embody the CHRIS architecture. In this video we wee the "super internet mind transfer from INSERM to IIT". More technically, the ability to perform the "put OBJECT at LOCATION" command was learned by the icub at INSERM in Lyon, where it could then be used in a shared plan for "uncover the toy". Later, in Genoa, the IIT iCub is able to use that information which was learned and acquired in Lyon, in order to perform the new task in Genoa. Thus, knowledge acquired by one robot can be used by another.
http://www.chrisfp7.eu/
The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Community's Information and Communication Technologies Seventh Framework Programme [FP7/2007-2013] under grant agreement n° [215805], the CHRIS project.
You lie. Your hardcoded variables OBJECT and LOCATION already imply the "put" procedure. It was not learned, it was already there in the program, although not accessible to Genoa first. It's not possible for iCub to learn new variables this way, for example that objects can be split into FORM and COLOR.
So what you really want is to put the CHRIS architecture into all research sites worldwide, so that it dominates about other architectures.
wlorenz65 1 year ago