Part 12 of 14. Carbon 14 and Other Radiometric Dating. Fossils. Integrity of Science. Young-Earth creationist Dr. Kent Hovind (drdino.com) debates theistic evolutionist John D. Callahan (faithreason.org), Dec-5-04. See faithreason.org/farmdeb.htm
Why do they always argue consensus? Can't they refute the question with data and evidence? Consensus is just scientists agreeing to a belief and if it was science it would be a fact not a belief.
You know, I wasted 5 minutes of my time trying to find a decent definition of tergiversatory and found nothing at all. I'm typing "tergiversatory" in the comment box right now and spell check has a red line underneath the word.
Ratio of Carbon? to what? It is not even a good question.
Carbon 14 dating works well, it has been cross check with other dating methods.
gregrutz 8 months ago
@grester the new name for global warming is "climate change" they can't even keep the name straight.
1965ace 2 years ago
Why do they always argue consensus? Can't they refute the question with data and evidence? Consensus is just scientists agreeing to a belief and if it was science it would be a fact not a belief.
1965ace 2 years ago
tergiversatory,,,,all things against God,,,,,get a real dictionary fool. amen brothers and comrades
gregelliselizabethno 2 years ago
The "science says" man is causing global warming... hahahaha
grester 2 years ago
What does tergiversatory mean?
pctopgs 2 years ago
I just might debunk all you creationist videos.....
pctopgs 2 years ago
Did you make that word up?
You know, I wasted 5 minutes of my time trying to find a decent definition of tergiversatory and found nothing at all. I'm typing "tergiversatory" in the comment box right now and spell check has a red line underneath the word.
pctopgs 2 years ago
tergiversatory. look up the word.
worm102 2 years ago
How is evolution a sin? jeeze...
pctopgs 2 years ago