Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Ignorance is not a form of 'proof'

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
44,154
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 14, 2008

So I've given into popular request, and the guilty pleasure of giving VFX, now dubbed PCS another spanking.

It's a point that I've been meaning to take up for some time now, his fundamentally flawed arguments from ignorance that:
1) Time can be treated in a Euclidian fashion (something that been known to be wrong for about 80 yrs), and this proves his god exists(?)
2) That just because his fantasies involve time not always existing, as does the big bang, that this somehow makes the credibility of the big bang theory equally applicable to his voyage of fantasy.

Footage from the beautyintheuniverse channel
http://www.youtube.com/user/beautyintheuniverse

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 301 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • So what, how dare he use logic and dislike those who fail to? Taking a negative tone towards stupidity does not make someone an ass, it makes them intolerant of stupidity; this is a good quality for a rational person to have, by the way. If Einstein (or Newton, or Galileo, or Descartes, or any scientific mind for that matter) totally accepted stupidity of his time, we would still be ruled by superstitious beliefs like geocentrism and the flat earth theory...

    In summary, quit being an idiot.

  • @Terrell8976 Its funny how boldly people can believe that they happened to be born in a country that predominantly teaches christianity, and how lucky they are that christianity happens to be the *way, the truth, the light*. HOW LUCKY YOU ARE! How lucky the muslims are too, cuz thats how they all feel...their's is the one way, the truth...etc. HOW LUCKY you all are that all religions claim exclusive righteousness, and that the one you were taught when you were a kid HAPPENED to be the right one.

see all

All Comments (965)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @gregrutz Electrons don't travel at the speed of light. Electrons do have mass. It is 9.10938188 × 10-31 kilograms or 0.511 MeV. Just letting you know.

  • @TheSherwin2261 na guess i missed it. thanks though. :)

  • @wlchambers 2:57 Mt St Helen's ~ 40 k yrs old ,covering most of the video, you didn't see that? lol :P

  • thunderf007. where are the mountains @ 3:04?

  • @gregrutz

    Well its probably a bigger problem that infinity energy is needed to accelerate something to the speed of light.

    So thats why you need something like a alcubierre(warp) drive, hyper(or a variation)drive, tunneling drive, or wormhole drive.

    Non of it has actually been dis-proven (for as far as I know) so its surely worth the try!

  • @NaliTikva Electrons travel at the speed of light. It would be tough to get somewhere faster than your atom's eletrons.

  • @Helge129

    And is believed to couse the ship to get at an other place in space time.

    Potentially faster than the light.

    Although probably the ship or whatever inside the bubble would die because of insane hawking radiation.

    And insane almouts of energy are needed!

    Source: Wikipedia

    Probably if we ever find a way, hyperspace, tunneling or wormholes are more effective.

    But it might violate causality, wish might be a problem. But I want a FTL ship :,( :,( :,(

  • @NaliTikva ...Which moves the spacetime around the ship, not the ship itself.

  • @Helge129

    Alcubierre drive FTW!

  • OK, Lets Play this Game

    You: PMS Pathetic Mouthpiece of Satan

    DonExodus2: ATNA All Talk No Action

    C0ncordance: RMWC Random Moron With a Camera

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more