The Single Bullet Theory

There are obvious flaws in the arguments of both the government's and its critics theories on the SBT. Maybe after 44 years its time to try another idea.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• jfk
• assassination
• single
• bullet
• theory
• conspiracy
• kennedy
• lee
• harvey
• oswald
• jack
• ruby
• dealy
• plaza

[InfoWarriorMaverick]

bobharris77 what do you think of the William Greer scenario? It's about the driver shooting Kennedy. @ 3:22 you could see that if the driver were shot from the front seat it might explain the 22 degree angle.

[bobharris77]

watch?v=DguBcLpWBS0

[RHDZ3]

Bob, I have a question.

Why then, were there witnesses that pointed to the book depository?

[bobharris77]

Because at least one shot probably did come from the depository. And because one high powered rifle shot was fired from the Daltex. The two positions were actually, very close to each other and it was impossible for witnesses to differentiate.

[whatdidulearn]

Like your work Bob..What about the first shot that hit the curb,  If Oswald is firing, he missed Kennedy by alot because that shot was about 6 seconds befor the last shot, so Kennedy would have been closer to Oswald making the angle steeper and yet the bullet hit the curb at an angle way less steep than what it should have been.

[bobharris77]

Thanks whatdidulearn. The first shot didn't strike the curb on Main, as Gerald Posner suggested or any other curb. It struck the pavement to JFK's right.

The lead frag that struck the curbing was from a shot that was fired later. I explain that in my video on the shot at frame 285.

That particular shot, almost certainly, came from the the third floor of the Daltex building, as did the SBT shot, which I talked about in this video.

[Peta659]

@bobharris77 THANKS!

[TheAmbassador11]

The shot in the throat was a frontal shot not an exit wound.

[TheAmbassador11]

An EXIT wound in the front of the neck that looked as neat as it did before the trach. by Dallas doctors? No blood or tissue spewing forth from that wound at the moment of impact from the back going foreward to the front of his neck? A neat "little hole" makes for an exit wound?

[TheAmbassador11]

@genericgeorge They were not...

[1239jer]

A final comment. Jim Braden you note was the only felon arrested at Dealy Plaza. He was at Dal-Tex. However, "felon" is not akin to "trained assassin." He was a burglar, an embezzler. What better time to steal when most office workers are out? Even so, he was caught. More to the point, there is no evidence this guy was a marksman of any note. Which he presumably would have had to be if tasked to shoot Kennedy.

[1239jer]

CE 399. The best you have here is the chain of custody. True, the work here was sloppy. But a) the bullet was matched to the rifle, which was seen firing bullets, which was matched to the trajectory (your interpretations notwithstanding). And b) supposing a "plant," how would the conspirators know they'd need a flattened bullet to match the wounds? That only small fragments would be lost? And wouldn't people question a relatively intact bullet? Doesn't add up.

[1239jer]

The D-T was a crowded office building. People were hanging out the windows, on the escapes. Gun shots from there would have been soon. Further, NOT A SINGLE PERSON reported seeing shots fired from there. Still further NO WEAPONS, NO SHELLS were found there. Why was Braden there? Why were thousands there that day? The onus is on you to establish the connection through evidence, not conjecture. We have Oswald, tons of evidence links him. None links Braden.

[1239jer]

The trajectory of the bullet. By lowering the wound, you suggest a different source. But the diagram you show has JFK sitting erect when he in fact seems to be sitting slightly slumped forward. This has the effect of deepening the angle as opposed to your shallow angle.

But your analysis collapses with the Braden id. How could do a shot have been fired from D-T with NONE of the people there on the fire escape noticing? Indeed, this was not a warehouse with empty floors, like the TSDB

[1239jer]

Your comments about the placing of the back wound are not accurate. The government "didn't pressure" Hume etc to move the wound, they TESTIFIED, inaccurately, as to the location of that wound. The correct location WAS as you note, in the autopsy report which is in the WC. The handling of the autopsy by the WC has been justifiably criticized, but later investigations had access to the photos and xrays, and have confirmed the essential WC findings.