Old Movies: Casino Royale, part II
Loading...
16,307
Loading...
Uploader Comments (FilmPoe)
Top Comments
-
The film is great, I wish you would shut up.Who are you anyway,please go away.
see all
All Comments (37)
-
i bet you can't get your head round monty pythons flying circus.retard.
-
Terrible movie, awesome revue
-
You missed the point, your analysis is based on the premise of this filme is a linear narrative rather than a multiple effort to recreate the Bond iconography.This filme should be appreciated in the context of London of the 60's. Sorry for you.
-
Good Movie...Bad Review
-
it made money... I´m speachless ...
-
is this just one film??? WEIRD
-
@SecretTimeWarp a close but firm second place for worst.
-
@woollybully100 ...What does that make Die Another Day?!
Loading...
You missed this biggest problem of this film.
Yes it has 6 directors but the three main ones who filmed, filmed separately from each other. They didn't even work together. Then the other 3 directors put their separate movies together as one. If you have the DVD I would recommend watching it with the commentary, it is very interesting and informative. But even after all that, I like the movie as a surrealist film not as a true bond film.
Drumman1001 2 years ago 5
Yes, I was actually aware that they didn't even work together, but I'm not quite sure why I didn't mention it...perhaps I felt it would interrupt the flow of the narrative?
But to treat this movie as a surrealist film...THAT is interesting! I didn't even consider that. Still, I feel that, if you've never seen this movie before, you're expecting either a Bond film or a Bond spoof, not a surrealist film. Badly marketed, perhaps.
FilmPoe 2 years ago