9. Climate Change - Meet the Scientists
Uploader Comments (potholer54)
Top Comments
-
@grandpied So you took my statement that “a small amount of strychnine can kill you” to mean that “small amounts of somethings can kill you” which means that “'small amounts' of something can be important” which means that “small amounts were not indicative of truth.” Even by the standards of misquoting I've shown in my videos, I'm impressed.
-
@grandpied = Earlier you had said that small amounts were not indicative of truth = If so, please tell me exactly where I said this. Give me the name of the video, and the time on the video where I said it, because it's clear you just made this up. I certainly said that a small amount of strichnine can kill you. How you managed to change this into "small amounts are not indicative of truth" seems to be the result of an overactive imagination.
All Comments (1,265)
-
@vengencefrom1979 The problem is that the world won't end with climate change, but it will be harder to live on it. And many people don't understand why we should take something that wont kill us seriously.
-
JAPANESE SKEPTICS;
Dr Maruyama said yesterday there was widespread scepticism among his colleagues about the IPCC's fourth and latest assessment report that most of the observed global temperature increase since the mid-20th century "is very likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations".
When this question was raised at a Japan Geoscience Union symposium last year, he said, "the result showed 90 per cent of the participants do not believe the IPCC report".
-
current CO2 levels are at 390 ppm and rising. it wont be long before antarctica begins to thaw as fast as greenland currently is, which btw is rising out of the sea at a rate of 1 inch per year. when antarctica thaws enough it too will rise out of the sea. it is connected to every tectonic plate around the world and will crack the earths crust. this isnt doomsday bull, this is science, and quite likely the worse threat facing mankind.
-
The amount of CO2 that man puts into the atmosphere each year is about 3 billion tons per year. But this is insignificant compared to the 39,000 billion tons in our oceans, 2,200 billion tons in our vegetation and soils, and 750 billion tons in our atmosphere.
All for a secondary, if not tertiary warming source. What is the leading Global warming element in earths atmosphere? Water forms the great majority of the effect, and it varies with a gust of wind and cloud cover.
-
Weren't these same scientists at the UN IPCC group the same people in the Club of Rome? Haven't each of them predicted the end of global civilization several times? Last time I looked, the IPCC made twenty year claims and we are 5 years along and NONE of them have been borne out. Even fractionally.
From the micronesian island sinking to global warming in Europe and America, but NOT in china, to the NorthWest passage, we have seen it all before.
Several times.
-
The point is valid. However it's a symptom or an underlining problem in science. Unless you are well established it is difficult to get funding to do proper research in a decanting opinion. Young scientists who have a collage bill to pay need to go where the work is. I agree fully that research in alternative climate models, the various non standard physics models, and so on need to be done if only to be good science. But sadly wanting to do them can mean no work to pay your bills..
-
He is straight and frank..
-
@sallyamis What the hell are you talking about? Did you even watch the rest of the videos in this series? He goes into great detail the science behind climate change in earlier videos
-
Hahaha, so much do I enjoy watching these liars get exposed, that I have watched this video multiple multiple times.
Al gore wasn't an expert too. Why do you believe him?
Maartenn100 5 months ago
@Maartenn100 =Al gore wasn't an expert too. Why do you believe him?= I agree. You'll find a debunk of Al Gore in my video "Climate Change -- Gore vs. Durkin."
potholer54 5 months ago 17