WTC collapse

Corporate Media owns you. Corporatism = fascism

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• wtc
• 911
• 9-11
• 9/11
• september
• world
• trade
• center
• collapse

[CAS53507]

you know it wasn't just a fire. a plane blasted threw it

[cotterbo]

@CAS53507 are you retarded? No plane hit building 7

[greeley1688]

this guy is an idiot!!!!!!!!! what brought the buildings down is not only fires, two fuckin airplanes caused severe structural damaged and the fire just added to the damage and aided the collapse, morons

[cotterbo]

do explain the collapse of WTC Building number 7.

please, do explain.

[cotterbo]

kid is retarded. dont even try to explain, his soul is lost.

good luck and may the sun be with you

[Guitargodadam6]

Oh my god seriously a plane goes through a fucking building its going to collapse and no fire didnt bring down the building maybe the fact the plane destroyed half the buildings support would be enough to bring it down you ever think of that you retards holy shit i hate you all

[cotterbo]

i think the 'retard' that you speak of adam is yourself.

Stop being brainwashed by corporations and the elite and open your eyes/brain.

the evidence is out there, and its not shown to you, you have to find it.

[Nacho773]

WTC 7 was not hit by anything.

[Nacho773]

It fell too uniformly

[NickWaterfall]

@Nacho773 It was hit by the north tower's debris.

[SamuelDMorgan]

@cotterbo building 7?

[Yellowbird74]

The same people who follow this fool would have probably followed Jim Jones and David Koresh. He's an idiot and so are the buffoons who believe him.

[TheRickyCaldwell]

The argument is that one side believes it was a control demolition, and the other thinks that a plane and fire can weaken not only the support of where it crashed but also all the way down the building... I think actually i know that control demolition makes far more sense than what the opposing side is arguing and that they are the conspiracy theorist who's facts are just people in high government and news reporters

[nickhawkman]

@ThePassiveFist rofl...you too. 

[ThePassiveFist]

@nickhawkman

And I'll fight for your right to have that opinion. I just wish that people from both sides of the argument could sit down, go through the evidence (or lack thereof) and come to a rational conclusion, even if all it is that they agree to disagree. i think this forum just isn't the right place to have those sorts of discussions, unfortunately. all you get is some text to reply to, and with an issue this big, it gets VERY loaded, very quickly.

Peace man. take care.

[nickhawkman]

@ThePassiveFist haha thats what you're doing its not what im doing. but you're right, all this doesnt really change anyones opinion. i guess when something like this happens, there will always be people who agree/disagree with how it was handled. nobody's the same. im not sure where the 9/11 conspiracy began, but i completely disagree with it. just my opinion...

[ThePassiveFist]

@nickhawkman

I wasn't giving you the lecture. I was simply discussing with the other users the likelyhood that the govt. story is either full of shit or the truth.

all added up, there is more shit than truth in the official story. you can go and foam at the mouth all you like, that's not gonna change anyone's opinion.

[nickhawkman]

@ThePassiveFist dude anyone who bellieves that 9/11 was pulled off by the gov has bullshit evidence that doesnt even line up right. DONT GIVE ME THE FUCKING LECTURE.

[nickhawkman]

@cotterbo hey. FUCK YOU.