911 World Trade Center "Dustification" and Impossible Flight Speeds

If you get your information only from Infowars, 911blogger, truthaction and other such "truth sites" you are missing out on a large section of legitimate 9/11 research which has been taking place.

One of the "Taboo" topics of the mainstream 9/11 Truth Movement is the "dustification" of the World Trade Center towers as shown by multiple video angles. These videos seem to show steel turning to dust and blowing away. There was hardly any steel after the destruction of the towers- much less than would be expected from even a controlled demolition.

(There was a lot of video fakery on 9/11, so there is the possibility the videos were faked, but don't rule it out)

The second point this video makes is that the mainstream 9/11 truth movement fails to address the impossible flight speeds allegedly displayed on 9/11.

Because of the density of air at sea-level, no Boeing could have flown that fast, even a remote controlled one. The media is directly behind both 9/11 and the mainstream 9/11 truth movement.

For more information on the dustification of the World Trade Center, check out drjudywood.com for more information on the media involvement on 9/11, check out September Clues in full.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• 911 truth
• judy wood
• no plane theory
• 911 dustification wtc
• 911 taboo
• september clues

[sanluisskywatch]

If you guys have better quality footage please share it. I'm just using what I could find.

I am also thinking that a lot of the footage from that day was faked, but I do feel that the strange nature of the events around the site- such as the engine blocks missing in cars and the fine dust rising from ground zero for months afterwards very strange-

The other thing that makes me think it's not all thermate is the fact that the rubble pile is too small to explain conventional demolitions.

[FirstUsedBooks]

Is that steel turning to cloud, or is it simply falling and leaving a fog of residue behind it, perhaps even thermitic afterproducts? Toasted cars 1/2 mi from the site, how does directed energy (DE) account for these any better than thermate? When did they burn? Bldg 7 also DE, but no apparent toasting? Too many holes in this theory at the moment.

[sanluisskywatch]

@FirstUsedBooks

It's clearly a steel structure turning into dust...

and there is clearly too few stories of debris left to explain conventional demolitions.

[Justin9Noble]

Disinfo.

[sanluisskywatch]

@Justin9Noble

Everyone's entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts.

Fact: Boeing 757, and 767 cannot fly as fast as was claimed. It's physically impossible.

Deal with it.

[mfrank165]

@sanluisskywatch here's another fact, an aluminum plane is not going to cut through a steel beam, one steel beam, no matter how fast it was going. try crashing a plane into a tank and see if the tank turns to a dust pile

[forugh3]

... depending on the relationship between light and darkness (which is always present, during the day we see it in shadows) - in each case, an image is not a good source of evidence. Just watch a film... a 'horror' film, for example. American comedies are far more terrifying that horror films. ....

[forugh3]

If you look at the released dust in the image of the remaining steel structure with the Solomon building on the left the dust looks sort of black, and not like the cloud of gray dust, but in the image of the steel between the two towers, the falling steel structure has the same color as the cloud of dust. Just gray. There is a difference. The transition of color can change depending on from where we observe. The sun is white in zenith, yellow in rising/decline, red in the horizon...

[forugh3]

better quality of the video

[forugh3]

I mean, why not better quality if you are such a seeker of truth

[forugh3]

the video is interesting, but ''The media is directly behind both 9/11 and the mainstream 9/11 truth movement.'' - no comment... I will comment... or ask the question: how is the media behind the 9/11 truth movement? I don't think neither of the two make their case presentable, and since you have not even bothered to give us a better quality of the images, this looks approximately just the same as most of the stuff concerning 9/11 here