Mathematically Perfected Economy PART 09A - IMF vs MPE

side-by-side walkthru of inherent monetary failure of the systems of exploitation imposed upon the world, versus mathematically perfected economy. NEXT: MPE vs USURY PART 09B - IMF vs MPE (OR VIEW FULL PROGRAM FROM PLAY LIST.)

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• MATHEMATICALLY
• PERFECTED
• ECONOMY
• PFMPE
• MPE
• MIKE
• MONTAGNE
• GREAT
• DEPRESSION
• RECESSION
• STIMULUS
• BAILOUT
• FEDERAL
• RESERVE
• OBAMA
• RON
• PAUL
• AMI
• STEPHEN
• ZARLENGA
• JAIKARAN
• ELLEN
• HODGSON
• BROWN

[oldspammer]

Most of the audio radio programs are very slow paced to get to the principles of your system. The introductory parts contain a lot of praise for the system without first explaining it in any detail. Obviously valueless money is money that has no obligation to pay anything to the holder of the money. By obligation to pay, you mean debt, but others mean bank debt upon which interest is always charged, & could also be monetized & used as a fractional reserve commodity, then sold to many others.

[mikemontagne]

@oldspammer You know, it was my work which introduced the inevitable consequences of interest-bearing debt. You think somehow that because you cite a mess of preposterous assertions that is somehow faster moving. But nothing you write or watched can explain why "interest is always charged, & could also be monetized..." "sold," etc. You're not meant for solution, pal. You're part of the problem. Probably the most vital part, because only a people who are disposed to failure, will.

[vendetta4v]

@oldspammer Very poor understanding. You need to look past the introduction to understand MPE. At the moment I have to say that you do not understand it nor how our current system is enslaving us.

[oldspammer]

@mikemontagne I had never heard of you or your work & had long known that borrowing large sums at high interest rates would be a potential downfall for anyone or any organization--those inevitable consequences were also well known & obvious to many others.

I'm not your pal.

I'm critical of you, but obviously your ego is very inflated to the point you think that you can or should decide & pronounce who is worthy of a solution to the corrupt government & monetary system in use today.

[oldspammer]

@mikemontagne So, others have explained this that prior to the instituting of "central banks" (a Jewish / Liberal / communist idea) governments & kings did not charge interest on currency they issued / spent into existence. Interest or fees was only always charged by Babylonian patterned bankers/merchants. So "interest is always charged"--only by them. So most of the solution is to do away with borrowing from them altogether by taxing loans as income.

[oldspammer]

@mikemontagne Currency as debt w/interest charged & with a compounding period can be seen by any high school student of math to be a system meant to collapse & require frequent bailing out because such a system has inflation built into it & works in favor of the currency issuers. System runs on money or wealth that was in the jurisdiction prior to it being instituted. It makes zero sense to borrow more to pay off growing interest charges--it's an endless snowballing effect.

[oldspammer]

@mikemontagne Prior to the Bank of England & others similarly purposed, Kings & Governments would coin or tax & spend money into existence without the currency being borrowed into existence & paying interest to the money creators who risked nothing to issue it. Thus, money was intrinsically worth something, could purchase lots of things & was debt & interest free. The King or Government would tax the population to keep inflation to near zero whilst providing good works to society.

[mikemontagne]

@oldspammer "Reaching lots of people is important, so dumb it down quite a bit. Don't use specialized terms, but instead, refer to historical situations by naming them after their key history..."

Many people have some idea for "dumbing down" the message. Not a single instance of a dumbed down explanation however conveys what we have to understand. "Ponzi Scheme" for instance?

You advise not to use "specialized terms" in the same sentence you recommend how to build them.

[mikemontagne]

@oldspammer Even the various sections are spun off as you suggest.

[mikemontagne]

@oldspammer

Little real piecing together is taking place, if the route has already been traveled by prior research. I would expect that perhaps further details will be discovered. But what does any of this matter when the principles of solution are irrefutable, and already at our feet? Do we profit by *ourselves* obfuscating all this *supposed* history into the equation? What we need to do is exert those irrefutable principles as a re-united people.

[mikemontagne]

@oldspammer

Reagan certainly wasn't brilliant. As to the latter theory however, I don't suppose that lack of brilliance would be so propitious as to succeed -- especially above a truly capable public, deserving actual representation (by understanding at least what that comprised). So if there is no public disposition to eradicate "economy" of its criminal destructions of representative government, what chance do we have?