Debate on RH Bill Part 1

Debate, Philippine RH Bill 5043 (Dec2008)

Roilo Golez - Edcel Lagman Debate on Reproductive Health or RH Bill which Golez opposes

Roilo Golez is one of the leading oppositors in the House against the Reproductive Health Bill or RH Bill sponsored by Cong. Edcel Lagman. Golez is shown in video interpellating Lagman who could not answer Golez's question: How do you consider children, assets or liabilities? Golez is of the position that with the right family and government support, every child can grow up as an asset to the nation and his/her birth should not be prevented by contraceptives, condoms, IUD and vasectomy.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Debate
• Philippine
• RH
• Bill
• HB
• 5043
• Roilo
• Golez
• Edcel
• Lagman
• Reproductive
• Health

[veritasdipolog]

THANKS GOD - POLL RESULTS DURING HARAPAN DEBATE AT ABC-CBN ON RH BILL MAY 8, 2011: IBASURA ANG RH BILL = 65.38%; IPASA ANG RH BILL = 34.62% I CHOOSE LIFE! NO TO RH BILL MORE PRAYERS...

[veritasdipolog]

Sabi ni Marian Chua: i dont buy hontiveros arguments. First,on freedom of choice, even without the rh bill, we are already enjoying this freedom. Decisions are being made everyday because of this freedom. Is she trying to imply that we are not free? the last time i checked nobody got imprisoned because of pills. then, what is her premise on freedom of choice?



[veritasdipolog]

Pero para sa akin ayaw ako ng MORAL CORRUPTION. It's very clear in the bible (Moral-Reference) na IMMORAL ANG CONTRACEPTION (Gen38:8-10). Kung hindi kaya ng mag-asawa ang maraming anak, NATURAL FAMILY PLANNING (NFP) ang paraan na tama at ayon sa HISTORIC CHRISTIAN PRINCIPLE. CHASTITY OR SEXUAL ABSTINENCE (FASTING) ANG AYON SA BIBLIYA AT HINDI ANG CONTRACEPTION. Pls try to read the content of this site: veritas899.weebly.com/why-no-t­o-rh-bill.html

[veritasdipolog]

Sabi ni Sheldon Villaluz Gravador: I prefer the natural methods (or NFP as you called it) above any other alternative. It is safe and cost-effective, with no side effects. It only takes self-restraint and mutual respect between couples. Preserving the health of our wives is equally important as preserving our marriages. Using these artificial methods only increases the risk of drug-related health problems. Apart from its morality issue, the RH-Bill is just a waste of taxpayers' money.

[veritasdipolog]

SABI NG KAIBIGAN KO NA PRO-RH-BILL, PRO-LIFE & PRO-DEVELOPMENT DAW ANG RH-BILL. SABI KO NAMAN, HINDI PRO-LIFE ANG RH-BILL DAHIL TAKOT MABUNTIS ANG NANAY. AT HINDI RIN PRO-DEVELOPMENT ANG RH-BILL DAHIL TAKOT MAG-KAANAK NG ISANG BATANG MAHIRAP NA KUNG MAGSISIKAP MAGING KAGAYA NI MANNY PACQUIAO NA UMANGAT ANG BUHAY NG DAHIL SA PAG-SISIKAP.

[veritasdipolog]

PACQUIAO: "Kung nag-condom pa ang tatay ko, nang dahil sa kahirapan namin noon, walang Manny Pacquiao ngayon"

[jambroco]

@veritasdipolog There are other churches contrary to CBCP's position that RH Bill was pro-abortion. They will support the president and 70% of Filipinos who favor this bill. God knows exactly the government's responsibility, separated from church who suppose to only inspire spirituality and preach about salvation.

“Render unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s, and unto God the things that are God’s”

Matthew 22:21

[nil1230]

ang problema sa bansang ito..hindi OVERPOPULASYON kung di KURAPSYON!!

CORRUPTION!!

CORRUPTION!!

CORRUPTION!!

KAHIT SABIHIN NYO PA KUNG OVERPOPULATED TAYO O UNDERPOPULATED..KUNG WALA NMN TRABAHO ANG MGA TAO..AT MAY KURAP..GANUN PARIN. DAMI MAHIRAP!!

[killuass1]

ikanga, go and multiply...

[razylanthony]

PACMAN:- kung gumamit ng contraception ang nanay ko noon, wla snang PACMAN ngaun. ^_^

[razylanthony]

the pro RH are anti christ!,,, contraception is tantamount to abortion,, (Jn.14:6)-christ si life.

[razylanthony]

the pro RH are anti christ!,,, contraception is tantamount to abortion,, (Jn.14:6)-christ si life.