Statistics 21 - Lecture 6
Loading...
Loading...
25 videosStatistics 21, 001 - Spring 2010- 1:16:56
Statistics 21 - Lecture 7by UCBerkeley7,687 views
- 1:17:24
Statistics 21 - Lecture 8by UCBerkeley7,458 views
- 1:19:30
Statistics 21 - Lecture 5by UCBerkeley10,831 views
- 1:08:18
Statistics 21 - Lecture 1by UCBerkeley124,297 views
- 1:52:10
Unit 4: Probability, Lecture 1 | MIT 6.050J Information and Entropy, Spring 2008by MIT12,365 views
- 1:19:07
Statistics 21 - Lecture 10by UCBerkeley8,516 views
- 1:18:41
Statistics 21 - Lecture 16by UCBerkeley5,655 views
- 1:20:53
Statistics 21 - Lecture 24by UCBerkeley2,605 views
- 15:01
10. Random Variables and Intro to Probability Distributions-00by minh199413,504 views
- 1:22:12
Statistics 21 - Lecture 25by UCBerkeley14,621 views
- 57:28
Statistics 21 - lecture 1by UCBerkeley8,718 views
- 9:45
Introductory Statistics - Chapter 4: Probabilityby perdiscotv31,628 views
- 1:23:45
Statistics 21 - Lecture 19by UCBerkeley1,842 views
- 4:23
Introduction to Microeconomics 101by jodiecongirl41,105 views
- 1:16:49
Statistics 21 - Lecture 22by UCBerkeley2,965 views
- 1:14:23
Statistics 21 - Lecture 3by UCBerkeley2,181 views
- 59:49
Lecture - 1 Introduction to the Theory of Probabilityby nptelhrd108,602 views
- 3:41
Colon Cancer Statisticsby Gapcast4,751 views
- 9:59
Daniel Judge- Statistics Lecture 1 (part 2)by daprof16,348 views
- 9:43
Introductory Statistics - Chapter 7: Estimationby perdiscotv15,110 views
He is a wonderful teacher who tries his best to clarify for his students what is abundantly crystal clear to him. He also seems to love what he does and that is contagious.
couchtalk 4 weeks ago 2
camera guy; I like your work however I find it hard to follow the prof. if you dont follow him, since this video is on youtube I can pause and rewind if I need to
thanks
Koni804 6 months ago
Great lecture, :)
Jabartanha 10 months ago
Note to self: 54:42 - Regression Method
edgeArchitect 1 year ago
@shamelesstill25 yea, for me it was not a PowerPoint Presentation, but a PowerNap time, ;(
edgeArchitect 1 year ago
You are correct! for sample correlation coefficient, it should be divided by n-1 not n. I think he is wrong here. Interestingly, if I give you a list of order pairs without telling you if they are the whole population or they are just a sample. You go ahead and calculate sample correlation coefficient (divide by n-1) and then calculate the population correlation coefficient (divide by n). You will see in either case you will get the same result.
kleinbogen 2 years ago
looking back on my college experience i really zoned out lots during power point presentations..
my stat teacher used blackboard tho <3
shamelesstill25 2 years ago
I see what you did...why use a nonstandard definition of the sd?
ZR666 2 years ago
Why is the division by n and not
(n-1) for the sample correlation coefficient?
ZR666 2 years ago