String Theory, M-theory, Parallel Worlds Pt. 1

Dr. Michio Kaku, professor of theoretical physics at City College of New York, discusses string theory, m-theory, and parrallel worlds with Dr. Brian Greene, professor at Columbia University, and Dr. Lisa Randall, professor at Harvard University.

Air date: December 26th, 2006, Explorations

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• michio
• kaku
• brian
• greene
• lisa
• randall
• string
• theory
• m-theory
• everything
• multi
• dimension
• quantum
• elegant
• universe
• membran

[godof79]

@Jesusfreak101Bemis And who are u again to attest he's real,what powers or special knowledge do u possess?have u seen him?what proof or evidence do u have to back ur incredible claim up? Let me guess..a book and the constructs of ur delusional feeble imagination only.Grow up,stop being a lobotomized dark-ages 12th century drone.Get a grip on reality,in your case,literally,as in things REAL.This is the 21st century but u choose to live in a realm of sheer idiocy.Spare me your religious babble.

[Nothingface2011]

He sounds like Stephen Hawkin at 1:58 to 2:01 haha!

[handbagsatdusk]

Another possibility - which - if enough people believe it - will become a 'truth' until it is replaced by another 'truth'

[cloffff]

Despite what the amusingly angry zealots ( @thebartone9119 ) claim, there are pretty serious reasons to think the theory might be right. And it is perfectly compatible with Occams Razor: claiming otherwise is similar to claiming that evolution goes against Occams Razor because it predicts a huge number of other creatures, but OR doesn't favor simplicity, it favors the fewest number of new assumptions, and based on that standard string/M-theory is dramatically favored over standard physics.

[theBartone9119]

M-Theory is a joke. It claims that there was something before The Big Bang when all the evidence points to time and space starting at The big Bang. It also goes against Occam's Razor, is purely speculative only backed up by math, and cannot be tested. Atheists promoting this theory should feel ultimately hypocritical for accepting this without evidence, just like religious people accept their belief without any evidence.

[MrLukasWilson]

You can't say "Grow up" while your attempting to rip apart someone's beliefs, it makes you look like hypocrite

[MischaLecter1]

Come on guys, settle down. Let's be hippies for a second...

and I just wanna say after watching this and another video of the super string theory with Dr. Brian Greene, I realize that HE IS HOT..now call me an airhead:D

[chicarbiomed]

@godof79 haha, nice pwn.

[jimmy134496]

@godof79 damn right!

[icomethird]

@biggyrat57 uhhhh, if your suggestion that its impossible to truly know whats real then i think you are incredibly foolish. what your suggesting is that you cant even know if what you just said is true, thus destroying your own argument.

[biggyrat57]

@godof79 No "end". It is rather eternally valid, like your math infinitely suggests. Inmutable? Not possible. Totally subjective, no way around the filters. Subject to our filtered observation of such. The subject of our psychological framework(s) and based upon our root assumptions both individual and en masse. An infinite number of personal realities, eternally valid.There is no destination, no end game, no inmutable "place". But, thank you for your response and, your "time", all the same.