Yamaha DX7 Frequency Modulation
Uploader Comments (dvamateur)
Top Comments
-
@PawzUK Because it was once fashionable to diss it as tiny sounding, etc. And even quite recently it was considered cool to chop the DX7 into pieces on a video. I personally don't consider such activity so cool. Come on, let's have some respect to fine Japanese craftsmanship.
-
@dncviorel thanks
All Comments (186)
-
@dvamateur Yes, it's certainly a bit strange at first if you're used to subtractive synthesis. I find it more practical than additive synthesis, though, from my limited experience of that. I had a Casio FZ-1 for a while (until it broke down). Maybe if you spend a lot of time building up collections of base waves it can be useful, but starting from scratch every time is a bit like building up a baby one cell at a time instead of having one in the more normal way.
-
@therealsweep Thank you for your consideration. Anyway, I think that FM is kind of a curious way of synthesis, I believe it's coming from the idea that any waveform can be obtained by a combination (addition, multiplication, etc.) of multiple sine waves (Fourier analysis). I believe that additive synthesis should be the subject of Synthesis 101 course, then one should go to subtractive, then maybe FM. I unfortunately never had a chance to do additive. Never had a Kawai K5 or Casio FZ-1
-
There's a helpful Yamaha forum I keep trying to link people to for questions they've asked, but YouTube seems to be disallowing links. It's w w w DOT y a m a h a f o r u m s DOT c o DOT u k SLASH f o r u m SLASH I hope that's acceptable to the YouTube censor.
-
@jeffknightrogen I don't have a DX100, but I can direct you to a forum where someone can help. I can't post the link as YouTube won't let me, so I'll try to email you. Also, I keep telling YouTube your post isn't spam, but it ignores that.
-
@dvamateur No problem. I can appreciate what you were saying and I certainly didn't think you were out of line.
-
@therealsweep Sorry, I get upset whenever anyone tells me to use softsynths in favor older instruments or computers which they say are obsolete. Basically, telling me to use Windows or Mas OS X works on me like a red sheet on a bull. Sorry, I behaved in an uncivilized manner replying to your comments previously. My apologies.
-
@dvamateur Sorry, Windows and Mac only. I can appreciate why you're avoiding them, though, from bitter experience. Regarding the latency problem, though, a lot depends on your computer and your soundcard. I get decent results from softsynths. It's just the unreliability of depending on Microsoft and Apple that's a problem. But original Yamaha FM stuff can be bought for pretty good prices, to hardware is a good option for FM synthesis.
at least this came out when patch memory was blowing up lol could you imagine if you couldnt save your sounds at all like on most if not all pre prophet 5 synths as i call em? that woulda been god awful with this synth and its a bear to program.....now thats not to say that this isnt an awesome synth. i love the dx7 i wish i owned one but id have to dedicate probably a whole week straight just to program it lol
caressxofxsteel 3 weeks ago
@caressxofxsteel well, in my opinion a sine wave based synthesizer (such as DX7) is a perfect complement to a sawtooth/square wave synthesizer (most analogs). A subtractive analog synthesis lends itself to some nice filter sweeps and swooshes, but believe it or not, even this can get tiring after a while, and then the FM based twocks and twangs might be something refreshing to hear. You can have a knob based FM synth, but due to memory presence, people started to use synths as preset organs...
dvamateur 3 weeks ago
I found this helpful: article in Keyboard Mag, June 1985, about DX7 programming. I actually got that issue of Keyboard off eBay. The entire issue is about synthesizer programming. You can get the PDF of that DX7 article here: w w w DOT abdn DOT ac DOT uk SLASH ~mth192 SLASH dx7 SLASH manuals SLASH prgrmdx7 DOT pdf
dvamateur 1 month ago