Climate Gate Controvery-Sen Inhofe Battles CNBC devote

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
399 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 25, 2009

No description available.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • CNBC = Can Never Be Candid

  • Nonsense....if you've looked at the emails online, which are authentic, they are very troublesome. Hiding data, getting around the Freedom of Information Act, cheering the departure of skeptics, admitting they are not seeing the warming temps they want, cooking the books..this host never gave the Senator a chance to answer.

see all

All Comments (13)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Peer-Reviwed , yea well, thats a bust ..

  • This is Imoprtant : Remember, once the Copenhagen treaty is signed, there is NO WAY OUT OF IT , EVER !

    That is the Truth, this conspiracy is to take over the World, this is the works of the Nephilim, the Bilderberg, illumitai dudes from way back then..

  • fuck nut news dude.

  • I second that.

  • Blaa blaa blaa, he is with Obama therefore he is legit. Are you kidding me guy? Just because someone is beside Obama does not mean they are legit, in fact there is a greater chance they are not, if you think any politician has power because they do things the right way your a moron. They surround themselves with the words best deceivers. This guy was reaching for straws. you can tell by how he attacks, he cant keep his cool. All you need to do is read the emails and you will see.

  • yes the bullshit meter hit a high! this one world gov brit is a boot licking word twister

  • @ace8842

    When the anchorman asked the senator "what specifically in these emails indicates that the science was wrong or manipulated..." Right there the senator should have given specific examples. As you said, there are MANY clear, specific examples within the emails of hiding, lying, and changing data to fit the global warming theory. Instead he talks about how some information was excluded from the official research. He should have come with some direct examples is all I was saying.

  • the host has interests in this affair? Sure looks worried...

    hey there are HUNDREDS of emails and docs to review, with nondescript names. Get on it!

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more