Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Oklahoma Autism

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
411 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 11, 2008

Newscast of story about legislature's action towards autism.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (7)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The taxpayers are paying currently. The education package Gov Henry that will bail out education in millions of dollars which includes school services for autism that leaves people paying more in taxes than they will ever pay in premium increases. Parents are not allowed to be heard and saving money in special educational taxes should be a priority. Republicans are about saving tax money not restricting care to people who need it.

  • Mr. Peterson,

    It is not about "Emotion". It is about the future of thousand autistic children in Oklahoma. It is NOT fair if all Parents with autistic children have to sell the house,and borrow the money to treat their children.

    Please look at the faces of autistic children in the movie. Don't worry too much about the insurance companies. They will be OK. These kids in the movie are very important. Take your action now or we will take you out of your office, Mr. Representative!!!

  • Mr. Peterson,

    It is not about "Emotion". It is about the future of thousand autistic children in Oklahoma. It is NOT fair if all Parents with autistic children have to sell the house, the cars, and borrow the money to treat their children.

    Please look at the faces of autistic children in the movie. Don't worry too much about the insurance companies. They will be OK. These kids in the movie are very important. Take your action now or we will take you out of your office, Mr. Representative!!!

  • Of course there will be an increase in cost for the insurance consumer! More significantly, there will be a decrease in profits for insurance companies. With the cost shared by the insurance companies perhaps the burden on taxpayers will be alleviated. What makes it ok to exclude these precious children from coverage and thus care? It breaks my heart knowing how much is spent on preventable disease due to smoking, excess weight and reckless behavior--all covered by insurance I might add.

  • Just another indication that Rep Peterson is against taxpayers. If no action, then the taxpayers will pick up the tab. Something that he can not understand.  Nick's Law is the fiscally responsible thing to do for taxpayers and morally obilgation for the children.

  • What a piece of sh*t! The cost will fall on the shoulders of the tax-payers if we do not do something NOW!

  • I hope this basterd's grand kids get the shit then maybe he will change his damn mind.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more